[00:00:02]
[I. Call Meeting to Order]
UH, 1722.UH, WELL NOW CALL THIS REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING TO ORDER, UH, WILL THE CITIES WILL ALL RAISE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PLEASE.
I PLAYED
ALISON PRESENT FLORES, KALE BRADSHAW PARSLEY PRESENT.
UH, EVERY COUNCIL MEMBER IS ALLOWED TO, UH, EXCUSE MEETINGS, A MOTION TO EXCUSE.
SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
[II. Approval of Minutes]
MOVE.MOVE TO APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.
I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS FOR APRIL 11TH, APRIL 19TH, AND SPECIAL REGULAR MEETING FOR THE SAME DATES.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND? I HAD A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN SYLVIA.
SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER PARSLEY.
MOTION PASSES 60 NOTHING AT THIS
[III. Citizen Comment Period with City Council]
TIME.UH, WE'LL HAVE BEEN THE FLORIDA CITIZENS, UH, COMMENTS.
UH, THE CITY COUNCIL WELCOMES COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS EARLY IN THE AGENDA OF REGULAR MEETINGS.
THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE ENCOURAGED TO SIGN.
AND BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS, SPEAKERS MAY BE PROVIDED WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK DURING THIS TIME PERIOD ON ANY AGENDA ITEM OR ANY OTHER MATTER CONCERNING CITY ISSUES.
AND THEY MUST OBSERVE THE THREE MINUTE RULE.
UH, PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR.
MR. CHAIR POINTER, UH, CREDITED.
THERE WAS FIVE MEMBERS ON THE BOARD.
SO THE MEETING MINUTES FOR PAST FIVE, ZERO.
DID YOU GET THAT CONFER? DID YOU GET THAT? THERE WAS ONLY FIVE.
THIS TIME WE ONLY HAVE ONE PERSON SIGNED UP TO, UH, SPEAK, UH, JASON KELL MAYOR PRETEND THE COUNCIL.
I WOULD LIKE TO THANK COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW FOR COMMITTING AT THE COUNCIL MEETING ON FOUR 19 TO PAYBACK ALL SPENDING DONE WITHOUT A RECEIPT FOR SPENDING THAT COULD NOT BE VERIFIED AGAINST CITY POLICY AND THE AGREEMENT SHE SIGNED.
I THINK IT IS ONLY FAIR THAT WHEN COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW REPAYS THE CITY, THIS MONEY THAT WOULD BE REFLECTED ON THE LINK THAT IS POSTED LISTING COUNCIL MEMBER SPENDING.
BY THE WAY, THANK YOU COUNCIL FOR VOTING TO HAVE THAT TRANSPARENCY FOR THE RESIDENTS.
SINCE COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW WILL BE REIMBURSING THE CITY IN LINE WITH HER FIDUCIARY DUTY.
IT SHOULD BE NOTED PUBLICLY WHEN SHE DOES SO WELL.
MAYOR MITCHELL PLEDGE TO DO THE SAME WILL COUNSEL REQUEST THAT FORMER COUNCIL MEMBER RICK COACH, TO THE SAME FOR SPENDING THAT WAS DONE AGAINST POLICY WHILE HE WAS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL.
THIS SPENDING IS CURRENTLY UNDER AUDIT WHILE THEY ARE REPAYING THE CITY FOR UNVERIFIED SPENDING IN VIOLATION OF CITY POLICY, WILL THEY ALSO BE REIMBURSING THE CITY FOR THE AMOUNT THEY SPENT ON GAS? THE CITY POLICY CLEARLY STATES THAT GAS REIMBURSEMENTS SPENDING IS NOT ALLOWED TRAVEL IS TO BE CLAIMED AS A PER MILE REIMBURSEMENT.
THIS IS THE POLICY FOR EVERY PERSON WITH THE CITY OF KYLE CREDIT CARD.
BY MY CALCULATIONS, USING THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE CITY WEBSITE, MAYOR MITCHELL SPENT $1,253.
COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW SPENT $920 AND COUNCIL MEMBER COACH SPENT $2,388 ON GAS ALONE.
THAT IS A TOTAL OF $4,561 OF SPENDING AGAINST CITY POLICY.
AND MOST CASES THEY DID NOT TURN THE RECEIPTS WITH THEIR SPENDING.
SO WE WILL HAVE TO ASSUME THAT WHEN THEY CLAIM THEY SPENT MONEY AGAINST POLICY, THEY WERE BEING HONEST ABOUT WHAT THE EXPENSE WAS.
MAYOR MITCHELL'S EXPENDITURES ON GAS COULD BE HIGHER BECAUSE HE HAS 30 LINE ITEMS OF EXPENDITURES LABELED ONLY TRAVEL THAT WERE ALL UNDER $120 EACH.
SO WE KNOW THEY WEREN'T FOR AIRLINES OR HOTELS, THOSE 30 ITEMS TOTAL AND ADDITIONAL $538.
THAT IS DIFFICULT TO CATEGORIZE.
INTERESTINGLY, MOST OF THOSE TRAVEL CHARGES WERE IN NOVEMBER OF 2021.
SO I LOOKED INTO A SPENDING FOR THAT MONTH IN NOVEMBER OF 2021 ALONE, HE HAD 60 LINE ITEM TRANSACTIONS FROM WHAT IS ON THE CITY WEBSITE.
CAN WE TURN IT INTO 28 RECEIPTS FOR THOSE 60 TRANSACTIONS OF THE 28 RECEIPTS? HE DID BOTHER TO TURN IN 21 OF THEM WERE FOR COFFEE AND OTHERS, 21 RECEIPTS FOR COFFEE, FOUR TIMES, 14 TIMES IN THAT ONE
[00:05:01]
MONTH ALONE, HE ONLY BOUGHT COFFEE FOR HIMSELF.SO IF ANY TAXPAYER WANTS TO SKIP THE MIDDLEMAN AND BY THE MAYOR, A CUP OF COFFEE, HE DRINKS AMERICANOS WITH HALF AND HALF CREAM.
THIS IS ONLY ONE MONTH AS AN EXAMPLE OF THE SPENDING DONE BY THESE THREE, IT WAS REPEATEDLY STATED AT THE COUNCIL MEETING THAT ANY STAFF BESIDES THE CITY MANAGER WOULD INSTANTLY, AND WITHOUT QUESTION BE CALLED TO ACCOUNT FOR THIS, THEY WOULD HAVE THEIR CAR PRIVILEGES REVOKED, AND THEY WOULD BE PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR THE AMOUNT THEY SPENT.
DO YOU EXPECT HIGHER FROM STAFF THAN FROM YOURSELVES? WHEREAS THE LEADERSHIP HERE, COUNCIL, IF YOU SAW A FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBER TAKING CASH OUT OF A CITY CASH REGISTER TO BUY THEMSELVES LUNCH OR PUT GAS IN THEIR CAR, WOULD YOU STAND UP AND SAY SOMETHING? HOW MANY TIMES WOULD YOU ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN IN SILENCE? WOULD YOU TELL THEM LET'S MOVE FORWARD AND NOT TALK ABOUT IT AND HOPE IT WOULD STOP A WORD OF WARNING TO THE RESIDENTS.
IF YOU TOOK MONEY FOR YOUR EMPLOYERS AND SPEND IT ON YOURSELF WITHOUT PERMISSION, THAT IS CALLED EMBEZZLEMENT.
ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK THE NON WILL NOW CLOSE THE CITIZENS COMMENT.
[4. National Police Week Proclamation. ~ Michael Tobias, Council Member]
NATIONAL POLICE WEEK PROCLAMATION COUNCIL MEMBER, MICHAEL CHAVEZ.UM, THIS IS, UH, UH, SUCH AN HONOR FOR ME TO READ AND I'M VERY THANKFUL TO BE A SPONSOR FOR THIS TO GIVE YOU A HISTORY.
NATIONAL POLICE WEEK IS HELD EVERY MAY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES FROM ACROSS THE COUNTRY COME TO WASHINGTON, DC FOR A NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS TO HONOR POLICE OFFICERS WHO HAVE DIED IN THE PERFORMANCE OF DUTY IN 1962, PRESIDENT KENNEDY PROCLAIMED MAY 9TH, MAY 15TH AS NATIONAL PEACE OFFICER MEMORIAL DAY WITH A JOINT RESOLUTION OF CONGRESS IN THE SAME YEAR, NATIONAL POLICE WEEK PAY SPECIAL RECONDITION TO THOSE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.
POLICE OFFICER WEEK INCLUDES THE ANNUAL CANDLELIGHT VIGIL AT THE NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL IN NORTHWEST NORTHWEST DC, AS WELL AS NATIONAL PEACE OFFICER'S MEMORIAL DAY.
BUT DURING THIS NATIONAL POLICE WEEK, WE WOULD LIKE TO RECOGNIZE THE DEDICATION AND DAILY SACRIFICE OF THE BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN OF OUR CAIO POLICE DEPARTMENT.
WE RECOGNIZE THE EXTRAORDINARY MEN AND WOMEN WHO WEAR CITY'S UNIFORM, WHO WEAR WITH PRIDE AND INTEGRITY.
BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, WE RECOGNIZE THOSE WHO TOOK THE OATH TO PROTECT AND SERVE OUR GREAT CITIES CITY AND OUR CITY AND ITS CITIZENS.
AS MENTIONED BEFORE, THERE ARE NO GREATER HEROES THAN THE ONES YOU SEE BEFORE US TODAY AND EVERY DAY IN A POLICE UNIFORM.
AND AS A NATION, WE MUST ALL CONTINUE TO COME TOGETHER TO HIGHLIGHT THE HARD WORK AND DEDICATION OF ALL THE BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN OF OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT.
SO WHAT THAT IS MY HONOR TO READ A CITY PROCLAMATION NATIONAL POLICE WEEK, 2022 TO RECOGNIZE NATIONAL POLICE WEEK 2022 TO HONOR THE SERVICE AND SACRIFICE OF THOSE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHILE PROTECTING OUR COMMUNITIES AND SAFEGUARDING OUR DEMOCRACY.
WHEREAS THERE ARE MORE THAN 800,000 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS SERVING IN THE COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES INCLUDED THE DEDICATED MEMBERS OF THE CAIRO POLICE DEPARTMENT.
WHEREAS SINCE THE FIRST RECORDED DEATH IN 1786, MORE THAN 23,000 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN THE UNITED STATES HAVE MADE THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE AND HAD BEEN KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY, INCLUDING 2,106 FROM THE STATE OF TEXAS.
WHEREAS THE NAMES OF THESE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVANTS ARE ENGRAVED ON THE WALLS OF THE NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL IN WASHINGTON, DC, WHEREAS 619 NEW NAMES OF FALLEN HEROES HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL THIS SPRING, INCLUDING 472 OFFICERS KILLED IN 2021 AND 147 OFFICERS KILLED IN PREVIOUS YEARS.
WHEREAS THE SERVICE AND SACRIFICE OF ALL OFFICERS KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY WILL BE HONORED DURING THE NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND 34TH CANDLE LIGHT VISUAL ON THE EVENING OF MAY 13TH, 2022.
WHEREAS THE CANDLELIGHT VIGIL IS PART OF THE NATIONAL POLICE WEEK, WHICH WILL BE OBSERVED.
THIS MAY, MAY 15TH THROUGH THE 21ST, WHEREAS MAY 15TH IS DESIGNATED AS POLICE OFFICER'S MEMORIAL DAY IN HONOR, OF ALL FALLEN
[00:10:01]
OFFICERS AND THEIR FAMILIES AND THE U S FLAGS SHALL BE FLOWN, HAD HAD MASS, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT I TRAPPED MISSION WILL TRAVIS MITCHELL, MAYOR OF CITY OF KYLE FORMERLY DESIGNATES MAY 15TH THROUGH THE 22ND, 2022 AS NATIONAL POLICE WEEK IN KYLE, TEXAS, AND PUBLICLY SALUTES THE SERVICE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN OUR COMMUNITY AND COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE NATION.COUNCILOR TOBY, ANY COMMENTS? YES.
UM, D I WAS VERY HONORED TO BE ABLE TO READ THIS, UM, BEING A 19 YEAR VETERAN WITH THE TRAVIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, I'M IN THE CORRECTIONS BUREAU, BUT I HAVE A LOT OF FRIENDS AND FAMILIES THAT HAVE SERVED, UM, IN LAW ENFORCEMENT.
AND, UM, THERE'S ONE PARTICULAR PERSON THAT I REMEMBER VERY WELL, MANY YEARS AGO THAT WAS KILLED IN LINE OF DUTY AND APD, UH, AUSTIN POLICE OFFICER, UM, HIGHWAY PATROL WAS SOMEBODY I KNEW.
AND, UM, IT, IT, IT REALLY HITS 'EM HITS ME REALLY HARD, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, IT'S, IT'S A CAREER THAT, UH, I CHERISH BECAUSE IT'S SERVING OUR COMMUNITY AND ALL THE POLICE OFFICERS THAT I KNOW AND ALL THE GREAT MEN AND WOMEN HAVE DEDICATED THEIR LIVES TO THIS CAREER.
AND, UH, I'M JUST VERY HONORED TO BE ABLE TO RECOGNIZE ALL OF YOU AS MY FRIENDS AND MY COWORKERS AND MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN BLUE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ALL YOUR DEDICATION AND YOUR HARD WORK ON SUMMER BURLESON, WELL SAID, COUNCIL MEMBER TO BE S UH, DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW THAT UP, BUT I DO WANT TO SHARE, UH, REALLY PERFECTLY MIGHT SENTIMENTS.
YOU KNOW, IT'S GREAT TO HAVE, UH, SOME OF OUR, UH, OFFICERS AND LEADERS FROM OUR GREAT PD HERE THIS EVENING.
WE ALSO HAVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM OUR CITIZENS, UH, POLICE ACADEMY, ALUMNI ASSOCIATION HERE AS WELL.
UH, YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S SO GREAT TO BE A PART OF A COMMUNITY, UM, THAT UNDERSTANDS, UH, THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROFESSION AND WHAT YOU ALL DO DAY IN AND DAY OUT AND TO SUPPORT YOU ALL, YOU KNOW, WE HAD A BOND PASSED DURING A PANDEMIC TO BUILD A NEW, UH, POLICE HEADQUARTERS FOR YOU ALL.
UH, THE VOTERS DECIDED TO REACH IN THEIR POCKET, EVEN DURING STRESSFUL TIMES TO SUPPORT YOU ALL.
AND, YOU KNOW, THAT IS THAT'S AMAZING COMMUNITY TO BE A PART OF.
BUT ON TOP OF THAT, WE ALSO UNDERSTAND THE SACRIFICE, THE GREAT SACRIFICE THAT IS ALSO SOMETIMES MADE BY SOME OF YOUR FELLOW OFFICERS AND RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD, WE'RE BUILDING A HEROES MEMORIAL WHERE WE WILL HONOR, UH, MANY OF THOSE, UH, AS WELL.
AND SO I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU ALL, UH, YOU KNOW, I HAVE GREAT RELATIONSHIPS WITH MANY OF YOU ALL KNOWN YOU FOR YEARS.
UH, AND SO CERTAINLY APPRECIATIVE THAT, UH, THIS WAS BROUGHT FORWARD AND, UH, HAPPY TO SUPPORT IT.
THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER ELLISON.
UM, BUT THIS TIME, COULD WE TAKE A PICTURE, PLEASE? I GET YOU
[5. Asian Pacific American Heritage Month City Council Proclamation. ~ DexEllison, Council Member]
FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION, COUNCILMAN REDEX, ELLISON.UH, SO I CAN'T TAKE CREDIT PROVIDING THIS BEAUTIFUL PROCLAMATION.
UH, IT WAS DONE FOR THE SECOND YEAR IN A ROW BY OUR SYSTEMS AND LISTS WITHIN OUR IT DEPARTMENT, MS. DANIELLE DELI OWNED GHETTO.
UH, SO, UH, I'M HONORED TO BE ABLE TO READ THIS PROCLAMATION ON HER BEHALF AND TO BE THE SECOND YEAR IN A ROW.
AND, UH, FIRST EVER TO MY, UH, UNDERSTANDING FOR HAVING A PROCLAMATION OF SUCH IN THE CITY OF KAI VIDEO CALL CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION, WHEREAS ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH
[00:15:01]
STARTED AS A COMMEMORATIVE OCCASION THAT BROADLY APPLIES TO, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL THE ASIAN CONTINENT AND THE PACIFIC ISLANDS OF MELANESIA, UM, MICRONESIA AND POLYNESIA.AND WHEREAS THE FIRST CELEBRATION ORIGINATED IN CONGRESS IN 1977, BY REPRESENTATIVE FRANK HORTON OF NEW YORK AND REPRESENTATIVE NORMAN MONETTA OF CALIFORNIA.
THE PROCLAMATION WAS INTRODUCED WITH HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION FIVE 40, WHICH PROCLAIM THE FIRST 10 DAYS IN MAY AS PACIFIC ASIAN AMERICAN HERITAGE WEEK DURING THE SAME YEAR DINNER, UH, SENATOR DANIEL ANYA INTRODUCED A SIMILAR RESOLUTION SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 72 AFTER TWO FAILED ATTEMPTS, REPRESENTATIVE HORTON WENT BACK AND INTRODUCE HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 1007 IN JUNE, 1978.
THIS RESOLUTION PROPOSED THAT THE PRESIDENT SHOULD PROCLAIM A WEEK DURING THE FIRST 10 DAYS IN MAY OF 1979 AS ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN HERITAGE WEEK.
THIS JOINT RESOLUTION WAS PASSED BY THE HOUSE AND THEN THE SENATE AND WAS SIGNED BY PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER ON OCTOBER 5TH, 1978 TO BECOME PUBLIC LAW, 94 DASH 95 DASH 419.
AND WE'RE AS OVER THE NEXT DECADE, PRESIDENTS PAST ANNUAL PROCLAMATIONS FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN HERITAGE WEEK UNTIL 1990.
WHEN CONGRESS PASSED PUBLIC LAW, 1 0 1 DASH 2 83, WHICH EXPANDED THE OBSERVANCE TO A MONTH.
FINALLY IN 1992, CONGRESS PASSED PUBLIC LAW 1 0 2 DASH FOUR 50, WHICH ANNUALLY DESIGNATED MAY AS ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH AND WAS SIGNED BY PRESIDENT GEORGE HW BUSH THAT SAME YEAR, THE ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE, A F L CIO IS THE FIRST AND ONLY NATIONAL ORGANIZATION WITH ASIAN-AMERICAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER WORKERS, WHICH ARE MOSTLY UNION MEMBERS, UH, ALLIES FOR ADVANCING WORKER RIGHTS ON BOTH IMMIGRATION AND CIVIL RIGHTS.
APA LA HAS ADDRESSED OVER 660,000 H A P I WORKPLACE ISSUES.
THEY SERVE AS THE BRIDGE BETWEEN THE LABOR MOVEMENT AND THE AAPI COMMUNITY.
AND WHEREAS THE MONTH OF MAY IS SIGNIFICANT AND WAS SELECTED AS IT COMMEMORATES THE FIRST IMMIGRATION BY THE JAPANESE IN 1843, AS WELL AS THE COMPLETION OF THE TRANSCONTINENTAL RAILROAD IN 1869, WHERE MOST OF THE WORKERS WERE CHINESE IMMIGRANTS.
AND WHEREAS THE CITY OF COLLEAGUE KNOWLEDGES THESE PAST WRONGDOINGS ON THE ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN PEOPLE AND URGES ITS CITIZENS TO PRACTICE INCLUSIVITY THROUGH CELEBRATING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF ITS ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN COMMUNITY, BY HONORING THEIR HISTORY, PEOPLE AND CULTURE, THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE CITY CALLED THAT THE MONTH OF MAY, 2000, UH, 2022 SHOULD BE CELEBRATED AS ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH AND APPRECIATION OF THE MINI ACHIEVEMENT OF KYLE'S ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN COMMUNITY, AND THOSE ACROSS THIS NATION AND ITS HISTORY SIGN AN INTERDIS 17TH DAY OF MAY, 2000 TO 22, A COUPLE THINGS I WANT TO MENTION CAUSE SHE MAY BE WATCHING.
THERE WERE A NUMBER OF COUNTRY NAMES IN HERE THAT I SKIPPED OVER.
I DID NOT WANT TO BUTCHER THEM, UH, BUT I, THEY WILL BE POSTED ON OUR WEBSITE WITH ALL OF OUR PROCLAMATIONS, FOR ANYONE TO SEE.
THANK YOU, JENNIFER, FOR GETTING THIS READY FOR US, UH, THIS EVENING.
AND ONCE AGAIN, A SPECIAL THANKS TO DANIELLA FOR A SECOND YEAR IN A ROW, WRITING THIS, UH, SHE PROBABLY WOULD'VE LIKED HIM TO DO THIS, BUT THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT SHE'S VERY COMFORTABLE WITH.
I WOULD HAVE MADE HER READ IT AGAIN.
UH, BUT SHE DID EXPRESS HOW PROUD SHE WAS TO STEP UP AND DO SOMETHING OUTSIDE OF HER COMFORT ZONE, COMFORT ZONE AND REPRESENT, UH, HERSELF, HER CULTURE AND HER CHILDREN AND THOSE ALIKE.
SO, UH, I'M REALLY HONORED TO BE A PART OF THAT.
AND, UH, I WANT TO THANK YOU MR. SELLERS, AND THIS ENTIRE CALL STAFF FOR ALWAYS WANTING TO BE ENGAGED AND MAKING THIS A PLACE OF INCLUSIVITY.
ANY COMMENTS, CUSTOMER INTERVIEWS? I WAS GOING TO SAY, UM, THANK YOU DECKS.
IT'S, IT'S GREAT TOO, THAT WE, UH, EMBRACE ALL DIFFERENT CULTURES AND FROM DIFFERENT AREAS OF OUR COUNTRY AND IT'S ALL OVER THE WORLD.
THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS AGAIN FOR A SECOND YEAR ROLE.
UH, DID YOU WANT TO TAKE A PICTURE OR ARE WE GOOD? GOOD.
[00:20:20]
AT THIS[6. Update on various capital improvement projects, road projects, building program,and/or general operational activities where no action is required. ~ J. Scott Sellers,City Manager]
TIME, WE'LL HAVE AN UPDATE ON VARIOUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.UM, MS. SELLERS IS YOUR, DOES YOUR ITEM.
ALL RIGHT, COUNSEL, THROUGH THE MONTH OF MAY, WE ARE SOLICITING CITIZEN INPUT FOR FEEDBACK ON THE DOWNTOWN.
AS YOU KNOW, WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF A DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN.
THE SURVEY FOR THAT OPEN TO ALL THE PUBLIC HAS FOUND ON OUR WEBSITE, UH, AND, UH, I BELIEVE THAT'S ALSO ON ALL OF OUR SOCIAL MEDIA OUTLETS AS WELL.
SO PLEASE ENCOURAGE Y'ALL TO HELP US SPREAD THAT WORD.
AND LET'S HOPE WE CAN GET A GREAT RESPONSE RATE FOR THAT, THE NEXT ITEM, UH, NOT UP ON THE SCREEN, BUT THE NEXT ITEM MEMORIAL DAY, UH, OR NO, THIS IS THE BUDGET WORKSHOPS.
SO WE HAVE, UH, JUST SUCCESSFULLY HAD OUR FIRST BUDGET WORKSHOP.
SO THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO ATTENDED, UH, EITHER IN PERSON OR VIRTUALLY.
I KNOW THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE ONLINE.
UH, WE ARE LOOKING FOR FORWARD TO OUR NEXT BUDGET WORKSHOP IN JULY.
SO, UH, MORE, MORE INFORMATION WE'LL WILL COME FORWARD ON THAT, BUT A GREAT PROCESS.
NOW WE HAVE MEMORIAL DAY, UH, JUST TO REMINDER OUT, WE ARE CLOSED ON MAY 30TH TO HONOR OUR VETERANS AND, UH, CITY OFFICES WILL ALL BE CLOSED THAT TIME.
NOW I'D LIKE TO BRING UP, UH, I BELIEVE IT IS CHIEF ON THE IC CHIEF'S NAME HERE.
I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE I'VE GOT THAT, THAT RIGHT FOR THE CITY WIDE CLEAN-UP THANK YOU.
MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL, JEFF BARNETT, CHIEF OF POLICE FOR THE RECORD.
UH, WE'RE VERY EXCITED TO HOST YOU AT ANOTHER CITY WIDE.
CLEAN-UP THIS SATURDAY, IT WILL BE AT GREG CLARK PARK.
WE'VE ENCOURAGED ALL THOSE INTERESTED TO SIGN UP ONLINE.
WE'RE TRYING TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT TO TRAFFIC AND THE WEIGHT THAT SOME CUSTOMERS EXPERIENCED LAST YEAR.
UH, THIS, THIS PARTICULAR EVENT IS WIDELY POPULAR AND BECAUSE OF THAT, IT'S HARD TO REGULATE HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SHOW UP.
SO WE WANTED TO DO THAT THIS YEAR TO MAKE EVERYBODY HAVE A MORE ENJOYABLE EXPERIENCE.
SO FROM SEVEN TO ONE, WE'RE GOING TO BE AT GREG CLARK PARK.
WE HAVE ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED ON OUR WEBSITE AND ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA, THAT WILL EXPLAIN WHAT ITEMS YOU CAN AND CANNOT BRING.
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO REGISTER FIRST.
YOU WILL GET A CONFIRMATION EMAIL IF YOU ARE ONE OF THE SUCCESSFUL 500 REGISTRANTS, AND THAT WILL TELL YOU EVERYTHING THAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT WHEN AND WHERE TO GO, WHAT YOU CAN AND CANNOT BRING WHAT YOU NEED TO BRING TO PROVE YOUR RESIDENCY.
AND WE HOPE THAT WE'LL HAVE AT LEAST 500 PEOPLE SIGN UP AND COME BRING IN THE THINGS THAT YOU NEED TO DISCARD.
WE'RE HAPPY TO DO IT AGAIN THIS YEAR.
UM, CERTAINLY APPRECIATE YOU CLARIFYING.
THEY GET THAT EMAIL, LETTING THEM KNOW THEY'RE REGISTERED.
AND, UH, ANY IDEA OF HOW MANY SPOTS ROUGHLY THERE MAY STILL BE? I SEE THAT THE CLOSE, UH, PER REGISTRATION HAPPENS ON THIS THURSDAY AT FIVE.
I DID NOT GET THE NUMBERS AFTERNOON.
IF YOU DO NOT BOX OPEN, RACHEL RACHEL IS GOING GREAT, 315 SPOTS STILL AVAILABLE.
SO WE NEED TO REALLY GET WORD OUT AND LET PEOPLE COME.
WE KNOW THEY HAVE AN INTEREST BECAUSE LAST YEAR WE HAD HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS.
AND THEN IF YOU DO NOT MAKE THE 500 CUT, YOU WILL ALSO RECEIVE AN EMAIL THAT TELLS YOU THAT YOU DIDN'T MAKE THE CUT.
SHOULD WE EXCEED THAT 500? SO YEAH, PLEASE COME OUT AND JOIN US AND BRING THE STUFF THAT YOU NEED TO DISCARD.
THREE NEXT, WE HAVE MARIANNA ESPINOSA MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL, MARIANA SPINOZA, PARKS, RECREATION DIRECTOR.
WE HAVE OUR FAMILY SKATE NIGHTS FROM SEVEN TO NINE.
WE WILL HAVE ADJ AND CONCESSIONS AND REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED ONLINE, BUT YOU CAN ALSO DO IN-PERSON WHEN YOU ARRIVE.
AND THEN NEXT FRIDAY, WE HAVE MOVIE IN THE PARK AND THAT IS, UM, AT SUNDOWN AT GREG CLARK PARK.
IT IS FREE TO REGISTER AND IS AT THE BASKETBALL COURTS AT REC CLARK PARK.
WE ARE STILL LOOKING FOR VENDORS FOR MARKET DAYS AND JUNETEENTH.
OUR MARKET DAYS IS JUST OUR FIRST MARKET.
AND THE SEASON IS JUST OVER THREE AND A HALF WEEKS AWAY, STARTING ON JUNE 11TH IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE JUNETEENTH CELEBRATION.
AND WE HAVE OUR NATIONAL TRAILS DAY ON JUNE 4TH.
I WILL HAVE A FREE GUIDED TRAILS TOURS AND A FREE SCAVENGER HUNT AT WATERLOO PARK.
AND THAT CONCLUDES THE REPORT.
ALL RIGHT, THAT CONCLUDES OUR REPORT.
[7. Update on low-hanging wires and unused utility poles on E RM 150. ~ ChancePadier, Environmental Services & Trades Division Manager]
FOR LOW HANGING WIRES AND UNUSED UTILITY POLES ON FM.ONE 50 CHANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IS YOUR ITEM.
[00:25:02]
GOOD EVENING.MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL, UH, CHANCE PRETTIER, ENVIRONMENTAL SURFACES AND TRAYS DIVISION MANAGER.
UM, OUR UPDATE FOR THAT SO FAR IS WE'VE MADE CONTACT WITH FRONTIER.
UM, THEY HAVE ACTUALLY RAISED THE WIRES, TAKEN A FEW OF THEM OUT OF THE QUESTION FOR NOW.
THEY DO HAVE A BIGGER PROJECT AND BRING EVERYBODY OUT AND REMOVE THE POLES.
UM, BUT WE DO NOT HAVE AN EXACT DATE ON THAT FOR RIGHT NOW, WAITING ON THEM TO CONTACT ME BACK SO WE CAN GET AN UPDATE.
ANY QUESTIONS? DOES IT RAQUEL? THANK YOU.
UM, I ACTUALLY SAW THEM OUT THERE THE OTHER DAY, SO IT WAS KIND OF, UH, IT WAS NICE.
SO, UM, WE DON'T, YOU SAID THERE WAS NO TIMELINE, BUT SO YOU'LL JUST BRING IT BACK WHENEVER YOU GET AN UPDATE.
THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO REACH OUT TO ME EITHER BY PHONE OR EMAIL MYSELF OR JERRY, ONE OF MY STAFF AND, UH, LET US KNOW WHEN THEY HAVE AN EXACT DATE.
THEY JUST NEED TO COORDINATE THROUGH A COUPLE OF THE ENTITIES TO BE ABLE TO GET ENOUGH PEOPLE OUT THERE TO DO IT AT ONCE.
BASICALLY ALL THOSE LINES WERE JUST THERE'S YES.
UH, THEY HAD STARTED OUT, I BELIEVE WITH P E C N THEN THEY BASICALLY ATTACHED ONTO IT, BUT THEY'RE LOOKING AT THEY'RE NON-EXISTENT PRETTY MUCH SO FAR, SO THEY'RE GOING TO MOVE THEM OUT AND ONTO THE BIGGER HOLES.
UM, I THINK, WELL, GOOD TO SEE YOU, MAN.
WE DON'T GET TO SEE YOU IN MR. BED TO SEE YOUR BROTHER.
UM, YEAH, I GUESS JUST WHENEVER WE GET THAT, IF WE COULD JUST GET THAT FORWARDED THROUGH MR. SELLERS, SO THE COUNCIL CAN BE AWARE, BUT WE REALLY APPRECIATE YOU STAYING ON TOP OF THAT.
AND, UH, THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS FORWARD.
UM, SO ARE THEY LOOKING AT REMOVING THE, ALL, MOST OF THE MAJORITY OF THOSE POWER LINES AND THEY'RE GOING TO ALL GO UNDER ON THE GROUND? I MEAN, OF COURSE, OBVIOUSLY FOR SECTION WE'RE, SPEAKING OF IS FOUR SEASON FARMS BY, AND TO DOLLAR GENERAL IN THAT AREA, FOR SURE RIGHT NOW, AND THEN GETTING A REPORT ON THE REST OF THEM.
THEY'RE NOT ALL FRONTIER, SO WE'RE TRYING TO REACH OUT AND FIGURE OUT WHAT THE REST OF THEM THAT ARE SINGULAR THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
SO DO WE HAVE AN IDEA, MAYBE THAT'S SOME OF THOSE POLLS EVENTUALLY FROM WHERE WE'RE AT ALL THE WAY DOWN TO WILDLIFE WILL BE BURIED UNDERGROUND AND I MEAN, TAKEN DOWN EVENTUALLY.
SO JUST REAL QUICK, IT'S NOT THE UTILITY, THE ELECTRIC LINES, IT'S THE, UH, UH, CABLE LINES THAT ARE CABLE LINES THAT ARE RIGHT IN THAT AREA.
THE NOT, NOT THE ELECTRICITY LINE.
THE CABLE LINES, CHUCK OUT THE MAIN HOLE, BUT THE SECONDARY POLE THAT'S OUT CLOSER TO THE ROAD.
THOSE ARE THE CABLE LINES THAT ARE DOWN.
AND YOU USED SPARINGLY THROUGHOUT THAT AREA THAT ARE A LITTLE BIT FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD IN, IN OTHER AREAS THROUGHOUT THE CITY THAT WE'RE INVESTIGATING RIGHT NOW.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT.
[8. CIP/Road Projects and Consent Agenda Presentation. ~ Leon Barba, P.E., CityEngineer]
PROJECTS AND CONSUMER AGENDA PRESENTATION, LEON BARBARA CITY ENGINEER.MAYOR
UH, IT LOOKS LIKE WE'RE GETTING TO THE END OF THIS PROJECT.
THEY'RE FINALIZING SOME CONCRETE AT THE HERO'S WALK STAIRS.
UH, THEY'RE STILL DOING SOME PLANNING IN THE AREA AND THEY'RE DOING SOME SOLID PREPARATION AT THE MEMORIAL GARDEN.
UH, THEY'RE INSTALLING THE RAILING ON THE BRIDGE AND THERE'S STILL SOME LIMESTONE PATTERNS THAT THEY'RE WORKING ON THERE AT THE CASCADE FEATURE THAT'S BEING FINALIZED.
AND THEY'RE EXPECTING TO COMPLETE THAT IN JULY LIVE AT THE PARK, UH, BASED ON THE PAY ESTIMATES THAT WE HAVE.
UH, THE OVERALL PROJECT IS AT 54% COMPLETION.
UH, THEY'RE WORKING ON STILL BRUSHING IT THROUGH THE BILLION STRUCTURE.
UH, THEY'RE WORKING THE VOLLEYBALL AND THE DOG RUN CONCRETE.
UH, THEY'RE INSTALLING CMU AT THE, THE INSTRUCTURE.
UH, THEY'RE ALSO WORKING ON THE CONCRETE FINALIZATION IN CORTEN STEEL.
IT'S GOING TO FOLLOW THEIR, UH, PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT IS, IS BEING INSTALLED AS WE SPEAK.
UH, THE EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE IS LATE 2022, AND WE'RE HOPING THAT, UH, GETS BETTER THAN THAT PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER.
UM, THEY'RE WORKING ON THE IN-WALL CMU ON PHASE ONE, PHASE TWO AND THREE.
THEY'RE WORKING ON PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL ROUGH IN PHASE THREE, THE MANSARD ROOF CHECKING IS BEING INSTALLED IN PHASE FOUR.
THEY'RE PUTTING SLIDE ON THE METAL DECK, UH, GETTING READY TO POUR CONCRETE ON THAT DECK.
UH, SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE, FEBRUARY 6TH, 2023, SOUTH SIDE WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, UH, WE'RE AT 94% COMPLETE, UH, NEXT SESSION THAT'S GOING TO BE CONSTRUCTED, WHICH IS THE LAST BIG SECTION OF THAT PARTICULAR PROJECT IS FROM EDWARDS DRIVE TO EAST POST ROAD COUNCIL.
JUST TO GIVE YOU A HEADS UP, UH, WE'RE GOING TO PROBABLY HAVE TWO MORE CHANGE ORDERS ON THIS PROJECT.
THIS NEXT ONE IS GOING TO BE SUBSTANTIAL.
AND AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING, I'LL EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR THE LARGE CHANGE ORDER.
THAT'S GOING TO BE COMING WITH THIS NEXT STEP.
IN THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT, WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION PROJECT, WE'RE AT 96% COMPLETE ON THE DE-WATERING FACILITY.
THEY CONTINUING TO WORK ON SATURDAYS.
AND THE SECOND DURANTY SECONDARY TREATMENT UNITS ARE, ARE STILL BEING TESTED.
UH, WE EXPECT THE EXPANSION TO BE ONLINE BY THE END OF THIS MONTH AND THE DE-WATERING FACILITY
[00:30:01]
WILL BE COMPLETE IN AUGUST OF 2022.AND THAT'S SOME OF THE TESTING THEY'VE BEEN DOING RECENTLY.
UH, THIS IS AT 97% COMPLETION.
UH, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A FINAL WALKTHROUGH LATER THIS WEEK.
UH, ALL WE NEED TO DO NOW IS JUST CLEANED IT UP AND, UH, DO SOME SEATING AND THIS LINE SHOULD BE READY BY THE END OF THE MONTH.
ALL POST ROAD CONSTRUCTION CONTINUES AT THE NORTH END.
I TALKED TO THE COUNTY THIS MORNING.
UH, THEY'RE HOPING BY LATE SUMMER THAT WE'LL BE FINISHING WITH THIS PROJECT.
SO I JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU THAT UPDATE ON THAT PROJECT ELLIOTT BRANCH INTERCEPTOR, WHERE IT'S 64% COMPLETE, UH, THERE'S STILL SOME ROWS CLOSE TO THROUGH TRAFFIC AND, UH, WE'RE EXPECTING TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT AT FALL OF 2022.
THIS ONE'S A LITTLE BIT HARDER TO READ SMALL PRINT.
THAT'S AN ADVANCED FUNDING AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE TO, UM, UH, AUTHORIZE WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
WHENEVER THEY REVIEW PLANS, THEY NEED TO HAVE AN ADVANCED FUNDING AGREEMENT IN PLACE SO THAT THEY CAN, UH, WE CAN PAY THEM TO REVIEW THOSE PLANS.
SO THAT'S WHAT ITEM 11 IS ABOUT.
AND THIS IS FOR THE, A QUIET ZONE.
THIS CAN BE IN PLACE THERE AT CENTER STREET.
SO WE'RE WORKING ON THE PLANS RIGHT NOW.
I'M NUMBER 12 IS A TASK ORDER TO CP AND Y THIS IS A PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT.
THIS IS THEY'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT COLORS CROSSING, AND THERE'S THREE PARTICULAR SECTIONS WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT.
THAT'S GOING TO BE AT SANDERS DINNER AND A COMMONWELL ON ITEM 14 THROUGH, UM, I JUST 14 THROUGH 21.
LET ME HOLD OFF A LITTLE BIT ON THAT.
I HAVE A MAP THAT I WANT TO SHARE WITH YOU, UH, ON ITEM 24, THAT'S THE CONTRACT THAT WE HAVE WITH VIKINGS INSTRUCTIONS TO DO OUR ANNUAL, UH, MICROSURFACING PROJECTS, MARIN COUNCIL.
THESE ARE THE ITEMS 2014 THROUGH 21.
AS YOU KNOW, WE'RE TRYING TO GET SOME BETTER ESTIMATES PUT TOGETHER FOR THESE PROJECTS.
THE PLAN IS TO GET ABOUT AT LEAST A 10% COMPLETION ON THESE PLANS TYPICALLY WOULD LIKE TO GET 30%, BUT, UH, SERIOUSLY, WE'VE GOT A COUPLE OF MONTHS TO GET THIS WORK DONE.
SO WE'RE HOPING THAT WE WOULD GET A 10%, UM, UH, S ESTIMATE FROM THE CONSULTANTS THAT HAVE BEEN SELECTED TO DO THESE PROJECTS.
THERE'S 11 ROAD PROJECTS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT.
AND, UM, I DIDN'T KNOW IF YOU WANTED ME TO GO OVER EACH ONE OF THESE PROJECTS.
I'D BE HAPPY TO JUST, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON EACH SPECIFIC PROJECT, THESE ARE ALL SUPPOSED TO BE FOUR LANE ROADWAYS.
THAT'S WE'RE GOING TO START WITH, AND WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING SIDEWALKS, UH, STREET LIGHTING, BARING UTILITIES, AND, UH, MAKING THE, MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A REALLY GOOD STREET, A COMPLETE STREET.
ANY CUSTOMERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? IS THIS MAP IN THE BACKUP.
THIS MAP IS IN EACH ONE OF THE AGENDA ITEMS. THANK YOU.
[V. Consent Agenda]
AGENDA ITEMS. ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS WANT TO PULL ANYTHING? YES, PLEASE.UM, MAY I PLEASE PULL 9, 12 24 AND 25? AND WITH THAT SAID, CAN I I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 20 21, 22, 23 AND 26.
SHE'S ASKING YOU TO HAVE A NUMBER 22.
WE HAVE TO PULL IT FOR A SECOND READING OR CAN WE VOTE ON IT? IT DOESN'T NEED TO BE PULLED.
ALL RIGHT, WE'VE GOT A MOTION.
WE'VE GOT A SECOND AT THE MOTION BY COUNCILMAN NEIL.
SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW.
[9. Approve Reimbursement Agreement between UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD,Omaha, Nebraska, in the amount not exceed $75,000.00, for preliminaryengineering services for the Vybe Trail Tunnel project bore underneath therailroad. ~ Allen Ross, Schaumberg and Polk, Inc.]
FIRST ONE UP WILL BE ZEN AGENDA, ITEM NUMBER NINE OF THE WORD KILLS.UM, I GUESS I'M CURIOUS, I THOUGHT THE CITY WAS NOT GOING TO, UM, HAVE TO PAY ANYTHING FOR THIS TUNNEL.
[00:35:01]
AND SO THE $75,000 IS GOING TO GO DIRECTLY TO THE RAILROAD.MA'AM AND AN ALLEN ROSS IS AVAILABLE ONLINE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AS WELL.
THE FUNDING WILL COME FROM THE DEVELOPER.
SO, SO THE DEVELOPERS ARE GOING TO REIMBURSE THE CITY.
IS THAT CORRECT? OR IF THE DEVELOPER IS GOING TO PAY DIRECTLY, WHY DO, WHY DO WE HAVE TO HAVE A CONTRACT WITH THE UNION PACIFIC FOR WHAT'S AN AMOUNT ATTACHED TO IT? COUNSEL PERSON, FOREST KALE.
UM, COUNSEL CARSON, AS A PART OF THE VIBE TRAIL PROJECT, THERE IS A PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL, UH, AT THE, UH, COW CROSSING PHASE TWO DEVELOPMENT.
UH, THE, UH, PROPOSED, UH, PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL GOES BENEATH THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD.
AND SO IN ORDER TO, UH, PARTICIPATE IN ANY CONSTRUCTION OR INFRASTRUCTURE THAT OCCURS WITHIN THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, UH, WE HAVE TO PREPARE, OR THE AGENCY AS YOU P CALLS SOMEONE, WHICH THE AGENCY IN THIS CASE IS THE CITY OF KYLE HAS TO PREPARE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS AND PRESENT THEM TO UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, UH, FOR REVIEW AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL.
UH, THE WAY THAT, UH, THE AGENCY OR THE CITY OF KYLE, UH, REIMBURSES THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD FOR SUCH REVIEW IS THROUGH THIS REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENT.
UH, IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, THE DEVELOPER OF CARL CROSSING PHASE TWO, WHAT YOU CSW IS, UH, FUNDING THE REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENT 100%.
SO THE $75,000 DOES NOT COME FROM THE CITY OF KYLE'S, UH, GENERAL FUND OR ANY OTHER FUND TO FUND IT'S BEING PROVIDED A HUNDRED PERCENT BY THE DEVELOPER.
SO THE CHECK TO THE CITY IS FROM CSW, AND THEN WE'LL HOLD THAT IN A FUND AND THEN IT'LL BE DRAWN DOWN BY UNION PACIFIC.
NOW I SEE THIS IS JUST AN ESTIMATE OF $75,000.
SO IT COULD ESSENTIALLY BE MORE, DOESN'T SAY IT COULD BE MORE, BUT BASED ON OUR, BASED ON THE BORING COMPANY'S RECENT EXPERIENCE, UH, IT SHOULD COVER, UH, THE REVIEW OF THE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS.
UH, HOWEVER, IF, I MEAN, IF MORE FUNDS ARE REQUIRED, THEN THE DEVELOPERS DSW WILL PROVIDE THOSE FUNDS.
IS THAT, IS THAT WRITTEN IN THE AGREEMENT? IT'S NOT WRITTEN INTO THE REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENT AND I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND CSW.
SO THEN HOW DO WE, UM, PROTECT THE CITY IN CASE IT SAY IT'S 150,000, IF THERE ARE ADDITIONAL FUNDS NEEDED, WE'LL REQUEST THOSE OF THE DEVELOPER.
OKAY, THAT'S IT, THAT'S ALL THE QUESTIONS ALSO REMEMBER PARSLEY, UM, FROM THOSE $3 MILLION THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE PUTTING TOWARDS THIS THERE'S 75,000 ARE GOING TO COME FROM THAT AMOUNT.
SO EVERY EVERYTHING THAT GETS EVERY STUDY, EVERY PERMIT IS GOING TO BE DRAWN OUT OF THAT WAY, THAT THE 3 MILLION IS GOING TO GO JUST LOWER AND LOWER.
UM, MY CONCERN IS IF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TUNNEL GOES OVER $3 MILLION OR OVER THAT AMOUNT, THAT THEY ARE STILL GOING TO BE PAYING FOR THAT NUMBER ONE.
UM, NUMBER TWO, WELL, THIS $75,000 GUARANTEE THAT UNION PACIFIC WILL GIVE US A PERMIT TO BUILD ALL PERMIT WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT, RIGHT? UH, COUNCIL PERSON.
IT DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT YOU WILL GET A CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, WHICH IS ULTIMATELY WHAT WE'RE PURSUING WITH UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD.
UH, THIS, UH, REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENT ONLY PROVIDES FOR EXACTLY THAT REIMBURSEMENT TO THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, UH, WHILE THEY REVIEW THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THAT WILL BE PREPARED BY YOUR THIRD PARTY ENGINEER, WHICH IN THIS CASE IS THE BORING COMPANY, UH, THE, THE, THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, WHICH CONTROLS THE RIGHT OF WAY.
I MEAN, THEY HAVE ABSOLUTE, UH, I GUESS, AUTHORITY TO EITHER APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE THE APPLIANCE
[00:40:01]
THAT WILL BE PRESENTED BY THE BORING CUP.HOWEVER, UH, I MEAN, WE'VE, WE'VE WORKED WITH UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, UH, OTHER PROJECTS, UH, WE FEEL AS LONG AS WE PROVIDE, OR AS LONG AS THE THIRD PARTY ENGINEER, WHICH IS THE BORING COMPANY PROVIDES GOOD ENGINEERING SERVICES, THAT IT HAS VERY HIGH CHANCE OF BEING APPROVED.
ULTIMATELY WHAT THE REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENT, UH, HAYES FOR UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD TO REVIEW THE PLANTS ONCE THEY'RE REVIEWED.
AND IF THEY'RE APPROVED, THEN IT MOVES FORWARD TO A CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, UH, BETWEEN THE CITY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD.
THAT AGREEMENT WILL ALSO BE FUNDED BY THE DEVELOPERS CSW, AND THEN COUNCIL MEMBER, AS PART OF THE DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT, THERE WILL BE A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE THAT THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOT EXCEED.
AND IF THAT PRICE IS OVER THAT $3 MILLION TOTAL LIMIT, WE'LL BRING THAT BACK TO COUNCIL.
WE COULD ABANDON THE PROJECT, ADD MORE FUNDS AS NEEDED.
LOOKING AT THE AGREEMENT SECTION NUMBER FOUR, IT SAYS AGENCY, WHICH WOULD BE THE CITY, CORRECT, ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT RAILROAD MAY WITHHOLD ITS APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT.
FOR ANY REASON IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION IMPACTS TO RAILROAD SAFETY FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS.
IF THE RAILROAD APPROVES THE PROJECT RAIL WILL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE AGENCY, WHICH IS A CITY TO DEVELOP THE FINAL PLAN SPECIFICATIONS, TO PREPARE MATERIAL AND FORCE COST ASSESSMENTS FOR THE PROJECT RELATING.
UM, SO I, UM, I, I UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION ABOUT THE ESTIMATE OF 75,000, WHICH I THINK, UH, COUNCIL MEMBER FLORES IS BRINGING UP.
UM, I'M NOW REDIRECTING IT MAYBE IN A DIFFERENT WAY.
MAYBE IT'S, THIS IS NOT THE CONVERSATION, BUT I'M JUST GOING TO BRING IT UP.
IF THIS GETS APPROVED THE WAY I'M LOOKING AT IT, WHEN THE, IF THEY START CONSTRUCTION ON THIS TUNNEL, DO WITH YOUR EXPERIENCE.
IF, IF YOU'VE DONE A TUNNEL LIKE THIS BEFORE, FOR HOW MANY HOURS AT A DAY DO THEY SHUT THAT RAILROAD DOWN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION? CAUSE AS WE KNOW, WHEN WE HAVE DOWNTOWN AND PEOPLE HAVE LIVED HERE IN KYLE FOR MANY YEARS, WHEN YOU HAVE TWO TRAINS PASSING, YOU COULD HAVE ABOUT A 30 TO 45 MINUTE WAIT JUST FOR THEM TO GO THROUGH.
SO A CONCERN THAT WAS BROUGHT UP TO ME FROM A CONSTITUENT WAS WE START THIS TUNNEL.
WE START DIGGING UNDERNEATH THESE TRACKS.
SOMETHING HAPPENS, THE DELAYS, WE HAVE A TRAIN THAT NEEDS TO GO THROUGH.
ARE THEY GOING TO BE STUCK IN OUR CITY FOR MANY HOURS OR DAYS AT A TIME COUNSEL PARTS AND TOBIAS? UH, THE ENDEAVOR OF THE BORING COMPANY WILL BE TO CONSTRUCT THE TUNNEL SUCH THAT THE RAILROAD TRACK IS NOT SHUT DOWN EVER.
AND IN FACT, IF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THAT THE BORING COMPANY PUT TOGETHER, UH, DON'T INCLUDE BASICALLY ZERO IMPACT TO THE RAILROAD OR AT LEAST TRAFFIC ON THE RAILROAD.
I DON'T THINK IT WILL BE APPROVED BY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD IN THE FIRST PLACE.
SO THE BORING COMPANY KNOWS GOING IN THAT THE BAR IS HIGH, UH, THAT THEY MUST DESIGN THIS THING AND THEN CONSTRUCT IT SUCH THE TRAFFIC ON THE RAILROAD TRACK IS NEVER IMPEDED.
THAT'S BEEN MADE CLEAR TO US IN THE EARLY, UH, MEETINGS WITH THE UNIVERSITY RAILROAD.
I MEAN, THEY STATED THAT UPFRONT.
SO THE BORING COMPANY UNDERSTANDS THAT IT'S A REQUIREMENT OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, AND THAT'S, THAT'S JUST THE, UH, SPECIFICATION THAT HAS TO BE MET THERE.
I APPRECIATE, UH, NO, THIS IS BEEN A, UH, PROBABLY A YEAR AND A HALF, AT LEAST THAT WE'VE GONE THROUGH THIS WITH THE DEVELOPER.
UH, THE ORIGINAL HAS MR. CHAVEZ EXPLAINED, UH, LAST COUNCIL MEETING.
UM, ORIGINALLY IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A BRIDGE OVER IT.
UM, WE LOOKED AT ALL KINDS OF OTHER DIFFERENT WAYS BEFORE WE EVEN CAME TO THE TUNNEL ASPECT.
UM, BUT IT JUST WASN'T VIABLE AND FEASIBLE WITHOUT BEING EXORBITANT COSTS AND A NUMBER OF OTHER DIFFERENT REASONS.
SAFETY WAS ANOTHER REASON, UH, MENTIONED.
SO I'D LIKE TO MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS IT IS WRITTEN.
AND I LIKE TO READ IT APPROVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD OMAHA, NEBRASKA, AND THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75,000 FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE BOB TRAIL TUNNEL PROJECT BORE UNDERNEATH THE RAILROAD.
[00:45:01]
WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILOR ELLISON.DO WE HAVE A SECOND SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER BRADSHAW? WE A DISCUSSION.
SO I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.
UM, FIRST OF ALL, IF THE CITY DECIDES NOT MOVE FORWARD, UM, AFTER THIS, THIS REIMBURSEMENT, WELL, THE CITY STILL BE REIMBURSED OF 50,000 AND THE $75,000.
SO THE DEVELOPER IS BRINGING A CHECK TO COVER THIS AMOUNT AND ASSUMING THE COUNCIL DOES NOT MOVE FORWARD, THEN THAT AMOUNTS JUST BASICALLY A WASH.
IT IT'S, IT'S ALREADY EXPENDED.
UH, THE REMAINDER OF THE $3 MILLION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT COULD THEN BE USED FOR, UH, OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT.
SO THE SET ASIDE OF 3 MILLION WAS FOR THE BIKE TRAIL FOR THE TUNNEL, UH, BUT IT COULD BE USED FOR OTHER THINGS.
AND DO WE KNOW THE COST OF THE MONTHLY? WELL, FIRST OF ALL, WHO'S GOING TO BE IN CHARGE OF MAINTAINING THIS TUNNEL.
I'M NOT SURE WITHIN THE TUNNEL ITSELF, IT'S, IT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
UH, WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS GOING TO BE ULTIMATELY A CSW, UH, WHO IS MAINTAINING THE TRAIL SEGMENT THROUGH THEIR UNDERLYING PRIVATE PROPERTY, BUT BECAUSE THIS IS UNDER RAILROAD RIGHT AWAY, UH, IT MAY FALL ON THE CITY AS THE, THE AGENCY, THAT'S THE OWNER OF THE PROJECT.
DO WE KNOW THE COST OF THE, OF THE MAINTENANCE? OKAY.
AND IN THE DOCUMENTS THAT WE WERE SENT LAST WEEK, UM, AFTER THE AGENDA MEETING, I SAW THAT THERE WAS ONE THAT WAS COMPARABLE THAT THE BORING COMPANY DID.
AND, UM, I THINK IT WAS IN LAS VEGAS.
UM, AND IT WAS 0.8, THREE OF A MILES.
AND THE MAINTENANCE ON THAT EVERY YEAR WAS $5 MILLION.
SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS NOT GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH AN EXPENSE, UM, THAT COULD LITERALLY FUND OUR ROADS.
SO, UM, I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING ELSE WE NEED TO THINK ABOUT MOVING FORWARD IS HOW ARE WE GOING TO MAINTAIN THIS? WHO'S GOING TO MAINTAIN IT AND HOW, HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO BE.
DEFINITELY SOME GREAT QUESTIONS.
UH, I THINK, UH, THE VEGAS ONE WAS A LITTLE MORE UNIQUE IN THE WAY THAT IT'S, UH, PUT TOGETHER WITH THE LIGHTS, THE, UH, THE PARKING, EVERYTHING ELSE.
BUT YEAH, THOSE ARE GREAT QUESTIONS THAT WE NEED TO HAVE ANSWERS TO.
UM, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT.
WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
THOSE OPPOSED SAY NAY MOTION PASSES FIVE TO ONE,
[12. Approve Task Order No. 8 to CP&Y, INC., Austin, Texas, in an amount not toexceed $65,847.50, to develop a Preliminary Engineering Report for the possibleinstallation of traffic signals or roundabouts at the intersections of KohlersCrossing and Sanders, Kohlers Crossing and Benner, and Kohlers Crossing andCromwell Drive. ~ Leon Barba, City Engineer]
RIGHT? JEN ITEM, NUMBER 12, COUNSELOR KELLY.YOU ASKED TO BE PULL THIS AGENDA ITEM.
I WOULD ONLY LIKE TO REQUEST TO READ THE REPORTS WHEN THEY'RE DONE AND THAT WAS IT.
SO WITH THAT, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 12, UNLESS ANYBODY ELSE HAS ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
UH, IT WAS SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER PARSLEY.
UH, ANY DISCUSSION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY, AYE, THOSE OPPOSED.
SO NUMBER 24, I JUST HAVE TO RECUSE FROM SO AFTER THE VOTE IS TAKEN, I'LL BE BACK.
[24. Approve a contract with VIKING CONSTRUCTION, INC., Georgetown, Texas,in an amount not to exceed $492,157.10 for the 2022 Miscellaneous StreetsMicro-Surfacing Project. ~ Leon Barba, P.E., City Engineer]
HAVE CR RECUSAL BY COUNCILMEMBER KALE FOR ITEM NUMBER 24.DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR ITEM NUMBER 24? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 24.
MOTION BY THE MAYOR PRO TEM SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER PARSLEY.
FIVE WILL GIVE COUNCIL MEMBER BACK.
[25. Addendum to the March 15, 2021 Letter Agreement for Legal Services to add thefollowing matter: CauseNo. 22-0813; The State of Texas, ex. rel. 1200 S. OldStagecoach Road, LLC v. City of Kyle, Texas; pending in the 207th JudicialDistrict Court of Hays County, Texas. ~ Paige Saenz, City Attorney]
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 25.THIS IS YOUR ITEM YOU ASKED TO BE PULLED.
UM, FOR STAFF, UM, WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE ACTUAL LAW FIRM THAT'S GOING TO BE REPRESENTING THE CITY? DENTON.
NAVARRO IS THE NAME OF ROXIE'S FIRM THAT SHE WORKS FOR.
MAY I ASK WHERE WE CONTINUOUSLY USE, UM, THE, THE VERBIAGE OR THE NAME? UM, THE NIGHT LAW FIRM, BECAUSE WE ARE YOUR CITY ATTORNEY.
SO IS THAT A DBA? ARE WE A DBA? NO.
I TRIED TO DO SOME RESEARCH AND IT LOOKED LIKE THE ENTITY WAS TERMINATED IN 2010.
[00:50:01]
IT WAS THE NIGHT LAW FIRM, COMMA PLLC.NO, IT WAS BARNEY NIGHTS FROM, FOR YEARS.
IT WAS NIGHT AND PARTNERS NIGHT AND ASSOCIATES.
AND THEN WHEN PAIGE AND I TOOK OVER IN 2016, IT BECAME THE NIGHT LAW FIRM, LLP.
I'M JUST GOING TO LOOK REAL QUICK IF YOU JUST GIVE ME A SECOND, JUST TO DOUBLE CHECK TO MAKE SURE I DIDN'T GET THE NAME WRONG.
AND IT'S CALLED THE K N I G H T.
SO IT'S NOT FOUND AT THE COMPTROLLER.
WHAT? I LOOKED IT UP AT THE SECRETARY OF STATE, IT SHOWS IS TERMINATED.
IS THERE SOME WAY WE CAN CONFIRM THAT BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE VOTE THAT'S FOR A DIFFERENT FIRM FOR DENT, NAVARRO, TOTALLY SEPARATE FROM, OKAY.
SO WHERE, SO I SEE THAT, BUT I THINK ON THE, I THINK ON THE LETTER, IT REFERENCES THE NIGHT LAW FIRM.
IS THAT NOT CORRECT? WHICH LITTER ARE YOU SPEAKING OF? UM, THE BACKUP FOR THIS AGENDA ITEM WE'VE GOT SOME RULES AND WANTS TO WEIGH IN.
WOULD YOU YIELD TO FOR, FOR A LITTLE BIT? SURE.
AND YOU HAVE THE FLOOR, UM,
WE HAVE A SECOND MOTION BY A COUNCILOR ELLISON SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER BRADSHAW.
ANY DISCUSSION? HOW ABOUT IT? SO JUST TO CONFIRM, IT'S THE NIGHT LAW FIRM, COMMA P LLC, L L P O P.
FOR WHATEVER REASON, IT'S NOT REGISTERED AT THE CONTROLLER.
SO I CAN'T GET ANY MORE INFORMATION.
IT SHOWS THAT, UM, SHOWS OKAY.
FOR THE END, FOR SOME, FOR SOME REASON IT SAYS EFFECTIVE SOS, REGISTRATION DATE, NOT REGISTERED AT THE CONTROLLER.
SO I WAS JUST CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.
WE ARE REGISTERED WHERE WE NEED TO BE, AND WE HAVE BEEN SINCE 2016.
I'M JUST GOING TO SHOW YOU SO YOU DON'T THINK I'M TRYING TO BE METERING.
SEE, THIS IS A GOVERNMENT WEBSITE AND I WAS JUST CONCERNED.
SO WE'VE GOT TO CALL THE QUESTION ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
I'M SORRY TO CALL THE QUESTION.
SO MOVING ON ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, UH, ITEM NUMBER 25 CTI, AYE.
THOSE OPPOSED SAY NAY MOTION PASSES SIX.
[27. Discussion and possible action regarding the City's legal procedures, to includeupdating the City of Kyle's registered agent, as well as reviewing and updatingcurrent/future policies regarding pending litigation. ~ Yvonne Flores-Cale, CouncilMember]
ALL RIGHT.CONSIDERING POSSIBLE ACTION DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE CITY'S LEGAL PROCEDURES TO INCLUDE UPDATING THE CITY OF KYLE'S REGISTERED AGENT, AS WELL AS REVIEWING AND UPLIFTING CURRENT FUTURE POLICIES REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION FOR SCALE.
UM, SO WHEN I FIRST CAME ON TO THE COUNCIL, UM, I, I WAS KIND OF CURIOUS AND THROWN INTO ALL OF THE LAWSUITS THAT THE CITY WAS ENTANGLED IN.
AND I JUST REALIZED OVER TIME THAT WE HAVE NO, UM, LEGAL PROCEDURE TO KEEP COUNSEL UPDATED.
AND SO I WAS HOPING THAT WE COULD DISCUSS IT AND FIGURE OUT HOW IT IS WE WANT TO STAY UPDATED, OR IF WE WANT TO STAY UPDATED, I DO APPRECIATE, UM, RANDOM UPDATES, EVEN IF THERE'S NOT MUCH ACTION, BUT IT'S PENDING.
AND I WAS CURIOUS IF ANYBODY ELSE WAS, UH, EQUALLY INTERESTED, I GUESS FOR ME WOULD BE THE CONCERN WOULD BE THAT IF WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF LITIGATION AND WE'RE GETTING THESE EMAILS, WOULD THEY BE ABLE TO PULL THESE EMAILS, UH, AND GIVE INFORMATION THAT WE WOULDN'T WANT OUT THERE DURING A COURT PROCEEDING? WE'RE ASSERT WE'RE CERTAINLY VERY JUDICIOUS IN WHAT WE'RE EMAILING OUT DURING LITIGATION.
UM, WE CAN GIVE VERY GENERALIZED SUMMARIES, BUT WE WOULD PREFER THAT RATHER THAN DOING ANY OF THAT, THAT WE SPEAK TO YOU ALL IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.
AND SO THAT WOULD BE THE PREFERRED METHOD OF GIVING AN UPDATE ON ANY KIND OF LITIGATION.
UM, IF SO, BUT IT SEEMS TO BE A BIT, I MEAN, IT DOES TALK ABOUT REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, IF THAT'S
[00:55:01]
ALL YOU'RE SPEAKING ABOUT, THEN YES, WE CAN ON THE, ON THE PERIODIC BASIS, UM, MS. FLORES, KALE, DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA OF HOW FREQUENTLY YOU MIGHT WANT THESE? OKAY.SO MY, I GUESS MY CONCERN IS NOT HEARING ABOUT IT UNTIL THERE IS ACTION THAT WE NEED TO TAKE, OR THERE IS SOME CONSIDERATION THAT, UM, WE NEED TO, TO DISCUSS, I WOULD SAY MAYBE EVERY SIX MONTHS IN EXEC A BRIEF FIVE, 10 MINUTE CONVERSATION UPDATING US ON THE STATUS OF THE PENDING LITIGATION.
WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO DO SOMETHING MORE THAN SIX MONTHS AND MAKE MORE FREQUENT THAN THAT.
I W I WAS JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT IF WE WERE DOING SOMETHING ON A MONTHLY BASIS IN LIGHT OF, UH, BUDGETARY ISSUES THAT WE'VE SPOKEN OF.
SO, UM, BUT NO, WE CAN CERTAINLY GIVE YOU ONGOING UPDATES.
I JUST KNOW IN OUR EXACT WEEK I FELT LIKE WE NEEDED MORE TIME.
UM, AND SO I FEEL LIKE TO GET ALL OUR ANSWERS QUESTIONS ANSWERED AND TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE MAKING GOOD DECISIONS AS A COUNCIL, THAT WE STAY APPRISED AS MUCH AS WE CAN.
SO THAT'S REALLY, MY GOAL IS JUST TO GET MORE INFORMATION AND NOT HAPPY TO PROVIDE THOSE.
AND WE CAN PROVIDE YOU A POLICY TO WORK WITH, UH, MR. SELLERS, THAT WE AFFORD YOU, THOSE OPPORTUNITIES TO GET YOU UPDATES.
UM, MY SECOND ITEM THAT I WANTED TO DISCUSS WAS, UM, ACTUALLY I'D WRITTEN THE CITY MANAGER AND ASKED HOW THE CITY'S REGISTERED AGENT WAS CHOSEN.
UM, I DIDN'T REALIZE UNTIL, UM, I RECEIVED A LAWSUIT THAT IT WAS IN FACT ARE AN ELECTED OFFICIAL THAT RECEIVED THE DOCUMENTS.
WHO'S A REGISTERED AGENT, AND IT JUST KIND OF BOTHERED ME BECAUSE I THINK THE REGISTERED AGENT REALLY SHOULD BE SOMEBODY THAT IS ALWAYS IN THE BUILDING.
UM, MAYBE A POSSIBLE STAFF MEMBER.
UM, AND SO I HAD MY GENUINE CURIOSITY WAS HOW OUR REGISTERED AGENT WAS CHOSEN CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE 17 0 2 24, DISCUSSES THAT AND MANDATES THAT, UM, WHO IS ALLOWED TO BE THE REGISTERED AGENT.
COULD YOU TELL ME WHAT THAT, THAT IS? UM, IT'S GENERALLY THE, UH, CITY SECRETARY RECEIVES AND, UH, THEN EITHER THE MAYOR OR THE CITY MANAGER MIGHT BE THE OTHER ONE.
UM, I DON'T BELIEVE YOU HAVE IT IN YOUR CHARTER ANY OTHER WAY.
UH, THAT'S THE ONLY OTHER WAY I, I HAVE SEEN IT IS ACTUALLY IN A CHARTER OF A CITY WHERE IT SPELLS OUT WHO IS SUPPOSED TO RECEIVE, BUT DEFAULT IS TO THE CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE.
I THINK IT SHOULD BE SOME TYPE OF STAFF, UM, WHO SHOULD BE IN THE BUILDING, UM, AND BEING ABLE TO BE SERVED BECAUSE I'M AWARE, UM, YOUR REGISTERED AGENT IS WHO GETS SERVED.
SO IF THEY CAN'T BE FOUND OR IF THEY'RE NOT IN THE OFFICE OR THEY'RE ON VACATION THAT JUST PROLONGS THE SERVICE TIME, IS THAT CORRECT? IT CERTAINLY COULD.
I DON'T THINK ANYBODY IS AVOIDING.
I'M NOT SAYING THAT, I GUESS BY NO MEANS, AM I ASSUMING ANYBODY'S AVOIDING IT? I JUST, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, UM, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SEE SOMEBODY AGAIN, WHO'S STAFF AND ALWAYS IN BUILDING SERVE AS A REGISTERED AGENT.
AND SO I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE A MEMBER OF STAFF BE THE CITY'S REGISTERED AGENT.
WE HAVE A MOTION TO COUNCIL MEMBER, KALE.
WE HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER PARSLEY, A DISCUSSION DON'T LISTEN, IT'S A MEMBER OF STAFF, NOT ALREADY LISTED AS A REGISTERED.
YOU MENTIONED THE CITY SECRETARY, THE CITY MANAGER.
SO I GUESS I'M NOT UNDERSTANDING, BUT WHAT WE WOULD BE ADDING I'M SPEAKING.
SO I GUESS W SO THOSE ARE THE LISTED PERSONS THAT ARE REGISTERED AGENTS FOR OUR CITY TO BE SERVED.
THE CITY'S GENERALLY WHO YOU ARE, YOU SERVE EITHER THE, THE CITY SECRETARY CITY MANAGER AND, OR THE MAYOR IS USUALLY WHO IS SERVED.
AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT, WHAT THE QUESTION IS.
AS FAR AS DEMARCATING, SOMEBODY WHO IS IN THE BUILDING, UM, AS WELL, R R ACCORDING TO THE LAWSUIT, IT SAYS IT WAS, UH, AN ELECTED OFFICIAL.
AND SO THAT'S WHY I'M CONFUSED AS TO WHY STAFF WASN'T THE REGISTERED AGENT.
INSTEAD, IT WAS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL AND THE
SO WE HAVE A MOTION, WE HAVE A CIRCUIT, UM, JUST ANY MORE DISCUSSION, UH, COUNSELOR,
[01:00:01]
HER TOPIA.AGAIN, SO WHO'S THE STAFF MEMBER THAT YOU'RE, YOU'RE REFERRING ON THIS MS. WALKER, WE HAVE THE CITY SECRETARY SITTING THERE.
I'M WONDERING, I GUESS I, I GUESS I THOUGHT OUR REGISTERED AGENT WAS THE ONLY THE ELECTED OFFICIAL, BUT IS THAT INCORRECT? CAN IT BE, WE ALREADY HAVE ONE.
IF WE WANTED TO HAVE SOMEBODY ASSIGNED SOME WATER, ONE AT A TIME, PLEASE, IF WE ALREADY HAVE SOMEBODY ASSIGNED, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHO WE NEED TO ASSIGN ANOTHER STAFF MEMBER FOR THIS.
IF THIS, IF THIS IS WHERE YOU'RE GOING, I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND FOR MYSELF.
SO I GUESS MY ASSUMPTION WAS WE ONLY HAD ONE REGISTERED AGENT.
THAT'S USUALLY YOU DON'T HAVE TWO OR THREE REGISTERED AGENTS.
SO IF YOU GUYS ARE TELLING ME THERE'S THREE REGISTERED AGENTS FOR THE CITY, IS THAT CORRECT? I'M SORRY, I HAVE ONE HERE.
17.02, FOUR OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE SAYS IN A SUIT AGAINST AN INCORPORATED CITY TOWN VILLAGE CITATION MAY BE SERVED ON THE MAYOR, CLERK, SECRETARY, OR TREASURER.
THOSE ARE OUR REGISTERED AGENTS THAT FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES, THAT'S THE, THE BREADTH OF IT.
SO WE GENERALLY HAVE THE CITY SECRETARY WHO IS ALWAYS AROUND AND IN LIEU OF THAT, THERE COULD BE, YOU KNOW, SOMEBODY ELSE THAT FILLS SOME OF THESE OTHER POSITIONS, AND IF THAT'S LACKING, THEN THE MAYOR.
SO THAT IS GREAT INFORMATION TO HAVE, AND IT'S WHAT I REQUESTED LAST WEEK AND I NEVER RECEIVED.
I'M JUST LETTING YOU KNOW, THE REASON WHY IT'S ON THE AGENDA IS BECAUSE I REQUESTED THAT INFORMATION.
AND IF IT COULD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED, IT WOULD HAVE FIXED A LOT OF CONFUSION.
SO WITH THAT, I, I LIKE TO WITHDRAW MY MOTION IF WITHDRAWAL SORT OF DRUNK.
[28. Update and discussion of Papa Jack's and Jack's Axes. ~ Yvonne Flores-Cale,Council Member]
UP, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 28, UPDATE AND DISCUSSION ON PAPA JACKS AND JACK'S AXIS.I WAS HOPING SOMEBODY COULD GIVE US AN UPDATE.
I SPOKE WITH, UH, MR. GREG HENRY THIS AFTERNOON ABOUT THE STATUS OF PAPA JACK AND, AND HE WAS EXCITED TO TELL ME THAT HE RECEIVED A NEGATIVE REPORT ON HIS ASBESTOS INSPECTION THAT HAS GENERAL CONTRACTOR WAS AS WE WERE SPEAKING AND FILING FOR DEMOLITION PERMIT AND THAT HE HAS CREWS READY TO GO.
AS SOON AS THAT PERMIT IS DELIVERED.
SO THE REPORT ON JACK'S ACCESS AS A LITTLE MURKIER, I'M GOING TO HAVE TO KEEP TAKING IT INTO THAT, AND I'LL SEND AN EMAIL AS SOON AS I HAVE THAT.
[29. Discussion and possible action addressing concerns from council and residentsregarding the City Manager and MUNICIPAL CONSULTING, LIMITEDLIABILITY COMPANY, to include any other authorized and/or unauthorizedoutside business activities. ~ Yvonne Flores-Cale, Council Member]
ALL RIGHT.AGENDA NUMBER 20, ITEM NUMBER 29.
ADDRESSING CONCERNS FROM COUNCIL AND RESIDENTS REGARDING THE CITY MANAGERS AND MUNICIPAL CONSULTING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO INCLUDE ANY OTHER AUTHORIZED AND UNAUTHORIZED OUTSIDE BUSINESS ACTIVITIES.
UH, THIS WAS, UH, DIRECTED BY COUNCIL TO BRING, COME BACK.
UM, YOU WERE THE ORIGINAL SIGNER, UH, COUSIN RAQUEL.
UM, THIS IS YOU CAN START THE ITEM OR COUNSELOR OF A GOOD THANK YOU.
AT THIS POINT, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO POSTPONE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 29, PLEASE.
WE'VE GOT A MOTION, BUT COUNCIL WERE KILLED.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? WE HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER PARSLEY.
UM, ANY DISCUSSION COUNCIL TO REMEMBER BRADSHAW? YEAH.
WE'D LIKE TO KNOW WHY IT'S BEING POSTPONED, UM, DUE TO A PENDING MATTER, WHICH I AM NOT ABLE TO DISCUSS.
I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR THIS AND I'M HAPPY TO GO BACK INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.
YEAH, THE, I THOUGHT WE WERE GOING TO, BUT I DON'T KNOW.
I THINK BY LAW, WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO TALK OR BY ORDINANCE, WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT.
WHEREAS WE CAN GO BACK INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS THE REASON WHY I'M ASKING FOR THE POSTPONEMENT IS NOT UP FOR DISCUSSION.
IT'S BECAUSE THERE'S AN ORDINANCE TO STATES.
I AM NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT.
SO YOU WANT US TO VOTE FOR SOMETHING, BUT YOU WON'T TELL US WHY WE'RE NOT VOTING I'M POSTPONING.
THAT MOTION HAS TO BE SUPPORTED BY VOTES.
I WAS TOLD I HAD TO BE THAT WAY TODAY IN AN EMAIL BY THE MAYOR THAT IT HAD TO BE A VOTE GAZA, BRADSHAW, ANY OTHER COMMENTS? OKAY.
GO MERCHANT ON SUMMARY ELLISON.
[01:05:01]
YOU'RE GOOD.WE'VE GOT A MOTION AND SECOND, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
UH, SO AT THIS TIME, UM, SO WHAT WE WERE BRINGING FORWARD AND THIS WAS WHAT COUNSEL WANTED TO KNOW WAS THE, UM, UH, YEAH.
DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT IF I'M GOING TO BE FORCED TO TALK ABOUT IT? I'M OKAY WITH THAT.
UM, SO WHAT HAPPENED WAS, UH, AT A PREVIOUS MEETING, UM, I PUT ON HERE TO DISCUSS THE CITY MANAGERS, LLC, UM, BECAUSE I HAD SOME RESIDENTS AND SOME OTHER PEOPLE THAT WERE CONCERNED REGARDING THE, UM, THE ETHICS TO THE COMPANY.
AND SO PRIOR TO COMING OUT AND TAKING ANY KIND OF VOTE, WE DISCUSSED IT IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.
AND THEN WE CAME OUT AND WE TOOK A VOTE TO WAIT UNTIL WE RECEIVED THE LEGAL OPINION BACK THAT OUR CITY MANAGER, UM, REQUESTED FROM OUR ETHICS ATTORNEY.
UM AND THEN ON THE SIXTH, WE RECEIVED A COPY OF THAT ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION.
AND WHAT I DID NOT KNOW AT THE TIME WAS THE QUESTION PRESENTED.
UM, AND SO I HAD PREVIOUSLY ASKED, UM, WAS ALL THE INFORMATION, GIVEN IT TO THE ETHICS ATTORNEY.
AND I WAS TOLD YES, HOWEVER, WHEN I RECEIVED THE OPINION BACK, UM, IT DID NOT, UM, TOUCH ON THE ISSUES THAT I HAD AT HAND.
AND SO, UM, I WAS CONCERNED, IN FACT, I DIDN'T EVEN ASK TO PUT THIS AGENDA ITEM ON THE AGENDA.
I JUST SIMPLY STATED I'D LIKED TO PUT IT BACK AFTER THE OPINION CAME BACK.
AND SO BECAUSE OF THAT, UM, I AM NOT PREPARED TO MOVE FORWARD, AND THAT WAS THE REASON FOR MY, UM, REQUEST TO POSTPONE ME OTHER DISCUSSION.
UM, I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT I READ THE ETHICS ATTORNEY FINDINGS AND, UM, I FOUND THAT THERE WAS NO ISSUE BEING BROUGHT UP.
UM, SO I HOPE I DON'T HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS IN REGARDS TO THIS.
UM, I FOUND MYSELF THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT THE INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED SEEMED TO BE COMPLETELY MY OPINION, THAT'S NEIL DISCUSSION.
I'M JUST GOING TO GO IN OVERALL READ WHAT IT WAS ON THE ADVISORY OPINION CAUSE IT'S ALREADY OUT THERE.
SO THE QUESTION WAS PRESENTED WHETHER PERSONAL CONSULTING COMPANY, MUNICIPAL CONSULTING, LLC MAY DO BUSINESS OTHER MUNICIPALITIES BY ASSISTING THEM IN CONTRACTING WITH A TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION FIRM TO PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TO RESIDENTS AND TO DO WHAT EXTENT THE BUSINESS CONFLICT WITH THE CITY OF KYLE CODE ETHICS.
SO BY ALL THE FACTUAL INFORMATION HERE AND IT'S, IT'S, YOU KNOW, UM, SEE MANAGERS GOT SELLERS AS THE ONE FOR THE, UM, ETHICS OPINION.
AND IF YOU GO ALL THE WAY DOWN AND IT COMES TO THE ETHICS, UH, COMPLIANCE OFFICER THERE BASICALLY SAYS CLEARLY THE INTENT BEHIND SECTION 2, 2 1 SAYS PROHIBITIVE FOR THE FIXATION OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS FOLK PROPERTY.
I DO NOT SEE HOW THE RECEIPT OF LETTERS RESULTS IN THE TAXPAYER USE OF FACTS OF YOUR DOG DOLLARS AMOUNTING TO A CODES, ETHICS VIOLATION, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE WARRANTING OFFICIAL REPRIMAND AND PUNISHMENT.
AND THAT WAS UNDER, THAT WAS ON PAGE FOUR.
SO THAT'S WHAT I HAVE AS FAR AS THIS GOES.
UM, THE SECTION 2 0 2 PERTAINS TO THE FORMER OFFICIALS USE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THAT IS NOT ALREADY AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.
THIS IS THE ONE SECTION THAT COULD APPLY TO MR.
FOR EXAMPLE, MR. COACH POSSESSED KNOWLEDGE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, UNRELATED TO THE KYLE UBER THREE 14 PROGRAMMING AND VOLUNTARY THAT CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL INFORMATION DURING THE COURSE OF HIS EMPLOYMENT OF MC, THEN MR. COACH WOULD HAVE COMMITTED A VIOLATION IF NECESSARILY KNEW MR. COACH WAS DIVULGING
[01:10:01]
SUCH INFORMATION.AND THEN HE TOO WOULD BE THAT VIOLATION AS LONG AS MR. COACH DID NOT DEVOLI ANY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION HE OBTAINED WHILE SERVING ON CITY COUNCIL.
AND THEN THIS IS NOT A VIOLATION OF CODE ETHICS FOR HIM TO BE EMPLOYED BY MC FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM IN IT'S THE END OF THE OPINION.
I THINK THAT'S WHERE WE'RE JUST TRYING TO GET OUT, TO FIND FOR THE PEOPLE OUT THERE OF WHAT WAS GOING ON.
AND IT HAD TO DO WITH THE POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH A CONSULTING COMPANY, WITH OUR CITY MANAGER AND FORMER MAYOR PRO TIM.
SO, UM, I STILL HAVEN'T GONE, SO LET ME WEIGH IN.
SO, UM, JUST REAL QUICK AND THEN I'LL GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY.
SO, UM, CAUSE REAL QUICK, MR. SELLERS, UM, THE, THE ONE PART THAT I WAS REALLY FOCUSING ON WAS ON THE ENDING WHERE IT TALKS ABOUT RECEIVING, UH, LETTERS OR, UH, HERE TO THE CITY.
AND I KNOW THAT THERE WAS AN OVERSIGHT BY YOUR PART, BUT YOU'VE STOPPED THAT NOW.
I JUST, I JUST WAS WONDERING, UH, DID, DID YOU REACH OUT TO ALL THESE TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY WERE NO LONGER SENDING ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOUR LLC TO THE CITY OF KYLE, UH, MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL? SO THE, THE ADDRESS FOR THE REGISTERED AGENT WAS THIS ADDRESS BECAUSE THE SECRETARY OF STATE STATES THAT EIGHT IS THE ADDRESS WHERE I WOULD BE DURING WORKING HOURS.
UH, I DID RECEIVE ONE LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY OF STATE AT WHICH TIME I IMMEDIATELY CHANGED THE REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS TO MY PERSONAL ADDRESS, UH, AS FOR, UH, MY COMPANY EVER HAVING A CONTRACT WITH UBER.
UH, IT HAS NEVER HAD A CONTRACT WITH UBER NOR WILL IT, UH, IN FACT, I HAVE CARVED THAT OUT ENTIRELY AND I'VE TAKEN MY CONSULTING WEBSITE DOWN.
UH, I WOULD STILL APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT FROM TIME TO TIME FOR OTHER ENTITIES, BUT, UH, UBER, HONEYWELL, WHICH WERE ALLEGED, I'VE NEVER HAD A CONTRACT, UH, NOR WILL I WITH EITHER ONE OF THOSE ENTITIES.
UM, AND I, I, YOU KNOW, I FEEL LIKE THE OPINION WAS, WAS FAIR.
UH, I DID GO BACK AND AMEND MY REQUEST FOR AN OPINION, TO INCLUDE THE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS THAT WERE BROUGHT UP AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING BY COUNCIL MEMBER FLORES, KALE, AND I COPIED THE, ARE INCLUDED THE, THE VIDEO SEGMENT.
SO, UH, I BELIEVE THE ETHICS COMPLIANCE OFFICER DID TRY TO ADDRESS THOSE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.
AND, UH, YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU, HOPEFULLY WHAT IS A FULL OPINION.
SO, UM, REFRESH MY MEMORY WHEN WE DID WE AS A COUNCIL, GIVE YOU PERMISSION TO DO THE CONSULTING.
DO YOU REMEMBER THE DATE ON THAT? I BELIEVE IT WAS JANUARY OF 2021 OR FEBRUARY 20, 19, 20 21 21.
I WAS A PART OF THAT COUNCIL AT THE TIME, AND I REMEMBER BEING VERY, UM, FRANK AND, UM, NOT ALLOWING YOU TO WORK WITH, UH, ENTITIES LIKE SAN MARCUS OR BUDA.
AND THAT WAS, THAT WAS MY DIRECTION.
AND THEN I'VE GOT TO TAKE A LITTLE BIT OF A BLAME ON THIS BECAUSE AFTER EVEN SAYING THAT WHEN OUR UBER THREE 14 PROGRAM CAME ONLINE, I ACTUALLY REACHED OUT TO STAFF TO SEE HOW WE COULD MAYBE EXTEND THE SERVICE TO MAYBE BUDA AND SOME MARKETS BRINGING THEM INTO THE FOLD AND SOMEHOW FINDING A WAY FOR IT TO STOP ON THE CITY OF THE CITY LIMITS.
AND THEN THE NEXT MUNICIPALITY TAKE OVER.
WE JUST UNFORTUNATELY COULD NEVER DO THAT.
AND THAT WAS ME GOING BACK ON WHAT I ORIGINALLY TOLD YOU WAS NOT TO, BUT THIS WAS ACTUALLY A CITY MANAGER, NOT AS A CONSULTANT.
SO, UM, I GUESS I'M KIND OF TORN THERE.
I FEEL LIKE I'M MAYBE HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH, UH, THE DIRECTION, I GUESS.
AND, UH, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IN THE PUBLIC, IT COULD LOOK BAD WHEN WE'RE LOOKING, WHEN WE'RE HAVE A PROGRAM IN THE CITY AND WE'RE TRYING, SOMEONE'S TRYING TO MARKET IT NOW, IF A PAST COUNCIL MEMBER IS DOING THAT, THAT'S, HE'S NO LONGER A PART OF THE CITY THAT'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT.
UH, BUT A STAFF OR EVEN A CURRENT COUNCIL MEMBER COULD BE FROWNED ON.
IT'S NOT ILLEGAL, BUT IT COULD BE FROWNED ON.
SO I APPRECIATE YOU DOING AWAY WITH THAT PART OF YOUR LLC AND DEFINITELY, UH, UH, RECOMMEND NOT, YOU KNOW, JUST BEING CAREFUL WITH ANYTHING.
AND I WAS ADVISING COUNSEL, IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND, THAT WOULD BE GREAT.
UM, I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ONE STEP, THE ADVISORY OPINION BY DOUG MONTGOMERY, THE CITY OF KYLE'S ETHICS COMPLIANCE OFFICER, AND A REAFFIRMED THE COUNCIL'S SUPPORT FOR, UM, THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN IN JANUARY OF 2021, UM, TO ALLOW THE CITY MANAGER TO PARTICIPATE IN CONSULTING SERVICES AND, AND, AND, UM, BUSINESS SERVICES MEETING, STILL THE SAME CRITERIA AND OUTLINED THAT WE GAVE ORIGINALLY NOT TO WORK WITH SISTER CITIES.
AND IF WE COULD JUST GO BACK TO THE RECORD OF ALL OF THOSE
[01:15:01]
OUTLINES, WE GAVE THAT I FELT VERY COMFORTABLE AT THAT TIME AS WELL.UH, AND PROVING THE CITY MANAGERS, UH, OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT.
SORRY, WE'VE GOT A MOTION BY COUNCIL BURLESON.
WE'VE GOT A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER, PRAD, SHAW, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
MOTION PASSES FIVE TO ONE STAFF, GET ALL THAT GREAT.
I'LL LET HER BELIEVE SOMETHING.
[30. Professional services agreement for 2022 Bond Election Public Education withDandy Planning dba Gap Strategies for $65,000. ~ Jerry Hendrix, Assistant CityManager]
I AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 2002 BOND ELECTION, PUBLIC ELECTION WITH SORRY, DANDY PLANNING AND GAP STRATEGIES FOR 65,000.MR. HENDRICKS IS YOUR ITEM, THE CITY MANAGER FOR THE RECORD FOR YEARS, A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THAT DANNY PLANNING, WHICH MOST OF YOU PROBABLY KNOW HAS GOT STRATEGIES TO DO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION CAMPAIGN FOR THE 2020 THROUGH 22 BOND PACKAGE.
YOU MIGHT REMEMBER BACK IN JUNE OF LAST YEAR, YOU PASSED A SIMILAR AGREEMENT WITH CAP STRATEGIES AND THAT AGREEMENT WAS EVER EXECUTED BECAUSE WE FELT LIKE WE NEEDED MORE TIME TO DEVELOP WHAT THE BOND PACKAGE WAS GOING TO BE.
UH, FUNDING IS AVAILABLE ON OUR CIP BUDGET THIS YEAR.
AND, UH, JEFF BARTON FROM DANDY PLANNING IS AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I HAVE, UM, BESIDES THE, SORRY, BESIDES THE, UM, THE ROADS, CAN YOU TELL US WHAT ELSE IS GOING TO BE ON THE BOND? LIKE WE KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO BE ON THE BOND, UH, WELL, EVERYTHING ASSOCIATED WITH RIGHT AWAY.
SO, UH, RIGHT AWAY ACQUISITION UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING, UH, THERE WILL BE REQUESTS FOR STATE AND FEDERAL ASSISTANCE AS WELL.
SO WE'LL BE COMMUNICATING WITH TXDOT CAMPO, UH, STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES, SENATE SENATORS, ET CETERA.
I'M REFERENCING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION.
DO WE HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT THEY MIGHT BE PRESENTING? I MEAN, THEY HAVE A PRETTY THOROUGH OUTLINE AND THEIR PROPOSAL, BUT I'LL ASK JEFF BARTON TO STEP UP AND GO THROUGH THAT.
UH, PROTEIN AND COUNCIL MEMBERS, JEFF BARTON, WITH GAB STRATEGIES OR DANNY PLANNING.
UH, IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WE'VE PROPOSED LAST YEAR AND WERE SELECTED THROUGH THE COMPETITIVE RFP COUNCIL MEMBER.
IT WOULD INCLUDE, UH, UH, A PROJECT WEBSITE SO THAT CITIZENS COULD FIND THAT EASILY, SOMETHING THAT WOULD, UH, THAT WE WOULD CREATE AND MAINTAIN, BUT COULD BE REFERENCED TRANSPARENTLY THROUGH THE CITY WEBSITE.
IN ADDITION, DESIGNING, NOT MAILING, BUT DESIGNING FOR THE CITY, SOME MAIL THAT WOULD, AGAIN, NOT ADVOCATE FOR ANY ONE POSITION OR ANOTHER, BUT EDUCATE CITIZENS ABOUT WHAT'S IN THE BOND PACKAGE THAT COULD BE INCLUDED FOR EXAMPLE, IN UTILITY BILLS OR PUT UP A LIBRARY.
THAT'S WHERE THING, A SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT AND CAMPAIGN PLUS TWO PUBLIC MEETINGS AND SOME VIRTUAL TOWN HALLS.
UH, I KNOW THAT YOU ALL ARE FAMILIAR WITH THOSE.
WE'VE HAD A LOT OF SUCCESS AROUND THE STATE.
WE'VE WORKED FOR A NUMBER OF SCHOOL, UH, BOND PACKAGES AROUND THE STATE RECENTLY, UH, CEDAR PARK IN PFLUGERVILLE, FOR EXAMPLE, AND HAD A LOT OF SUCCESS WITH VIRTUAL TOWN HALLS THAT ACCOMPANY THE IN-PERSON TOWN HALLS, AND THEN SOME MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORT FOR STAFF IN THE CITY AS WE MOVE FORWARD.
AND THAT WOULD BE, UH, IN ENGLISH.
IT THAT'D BE AN IN THIS VIDEO.
CAUSE, UH, THIS IS GOING TO BE A VERY, VERY IMPORTANT BOND, OBVIOUSLY FOR THE ROADS AND I'M SURE THERE'S GOING TO BE HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE, THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE, PROBABLY EVEN WANTING TO HAVE QUESTIONS.
AND, UH, IF APPROVED, WE GO THIS ROUTE, THE TYPE OF, UH, EDUCATION THAT WE CAN GIVE TO THE PUBLIC THAT YOU BE ABLE TO PROVIDE.
AND I WAS GOING TO ASK THE SAME DAY, IF WE WOULD HAVE TOWN HALL MEETINGS.
I KNOW THAT BRINGS A LOT OF PEOPLE IN, SO THEY ACTUALLY CAN SEE MAYBE A POSSIBLE MOBILE MODEL OR A MAP OR WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT TO REALLY BRING THE DOLLAR AMOUNT, BRINGING ALL THAT INFORMATION OUT FOR PEOPLE TO BE, MAKE A PRETTY GOOD EDUCATED VOTE ON THAT END, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, WE TAKE OUR FINAL DIRECTION FROM THE COUNCIL AND FROM YOUR STAFF MEMBERS ON EXACTLY HOW THAT WOULD ROLL OUT.
BUT I THINK OUR RECOMMENDATION IN THE PROPOSAL IS JUST THAT, THAT YOU HAVE THAT, THAT TOWN HALL MEETING WHERE PEOPLE COULD SEE, UH, AN EXPERIENCE REALLY WHAT'S GOING ON WITH BONDS LEARNED SOMETHING ABOUT GROWTH RATES, TRAFFIC COUNTS, BUT ALSO HOW THE CITY IS TRYING TO DO WITH THOSE.
AND THEN, AND AGAIN, NOT JUST WITH THAT IN-PERSON EVENT, BUT SOMETHING WHERE PEOPLE CAN SIT ON THEIR OWN COUCH AND MAYBE HAVE A WEEK TO LOG IN ANYTIME THAT'S CONVENIENT FOR THEM.
[01:20:01]
THEY SEE A REPLICATED EXPERIENCE, SOMETHING VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT THEY'D SEEN AT TOWN HALL, SO THEY CAN ZOOM IN ON SOME THEY CAN LEARN.THEY CAN LEARN ABOUT WHAT GROWTH PATTERNS ARE IN KYLE ABOUT WHAT'S TRAFFIC IS WHAT THE COST OF THE BONDS WOULD BE AND MAKE THEIR OWN DECISIONS.
WELL WITH THAT MAYOR PRO-TEAM, I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM, NUMBER 30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE 2022 BOND ELECTION, UH, EDUCATION AND PLANNING.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY CUSTOMER TO BE AS A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER ELLISON.
DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? NO QUICK MEMORY, TIM.
UM, SO JUST WANTED TO SAY, UM, YOU KNOW, I'VE BEEN IN AN INTERVIEW WHERE WE'VE, UH, REVIEWED GAP STRATEGY BEFORE, YOU KNOW, UH, AND, UH, I'VE KNOWN MR. BARTON AND, UH, HAVE HAD, UH, EXPERIENCED SEEING YOUR FIRM WORK WITH THE COUNTY ON ROAD BONDS, I BELIEVE, AND OTHER DIFFERENT ENTITIES AS WELL.
UH, ALL OF WHICH I BELIEVE HAVE PASSED.
UH, AND I THINK LARGELY BECAUSE OF THE EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION ASPECT OF THAT, UH, VOTERS NEED TO KNOW WHAT THEY'RE VOTING FOR.
UM, I KNOW IT'S TOUGH TO VOTE, TO IMPROVE, UH, INCREASE YOUR TAXES, BUT IF YOU FEEL LIKE YOU HAVE VALUE OUT OF THAT, UH, THEN THAT CAN HAPPEN.
AND I THINK THAT ONLY CAN HAPPEN WHEN THERE'S EDUCATION AND INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT THEY'RE VOTING ON.
AND SO I CERTAINLY APPRECIATE THE COUNCIL'S, UH, PUSH TOWARDS THAT.
I KNOW WE'RE WORKING VERY HARD WITH OUR ENGINEERING FIRMS TO GET AS MUCH INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED SO WE CAN DECIDE WHAT WE'LL PUT ON THAT BOND AND THE INFORMATION WE'LL PUT OUT.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY, AYE, AYE, ALL THOSE OPPOSED.
MOTION PASSES FIVE TO NOTHING.
WE DO THE SOUL OF THE STATE, BUT THIS IS HOME.
SO WE'RE PARTICULARLY EXCITED TO DO THE JOB.
[31. Consider authorizing the City's Director of Finance to initiate process, preparedocuments, and to coordinate all necessary steps for the issuance of GeneralObligation Bonds, Series 2022 in an amount not to exceed $37,000,000.00 toprovide funding for the design, construction, and all furniture, fixture, andequipment required for the new Kyle Public Safety Center facility as authorizedby the voters of Kyle, Texas on November 3, 2020. ~ Perwez A. Moheet, CPA,Director of Finance]
UP AGENDA.NUMBER 31, CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE CITY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO INITIATE THE PROCESS OF PREPARE DOCUMENTS AND THE COORDINATION OF ALL NECESSARY STEPS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS SERIES 2022 IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $37 MILLION TO PROVIDE FINDINGS FOR THE DESIGN CONSTRUCTION AND ALL FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR THE NEW PUBLIX KYLE PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER FACILITY AS AUTHORIZED BY THE VOTERS OF KYLE TEXAS ON NOVEMBER 3RD, 2020, MR. PEREZ, MOHIT IS YOUR ITEM, MR. MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR THE RECORD I'M FOR BEST MY CITY'S DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ON NOVEMBER 3RD, 2020, THE VOTERS OF KYLE APPROVED PROPOSITION, A AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $37 BILLION IN GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER FACILITY.
WHEN WE ISSUED TAX SUPPORTED DEBT IN THE CITY OF KYLE, IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY CHARTER, YOUR DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND THE CITY MANAGER, UH, FOLLOWS A TWO-STEP PROCESS.
WE COME BEFORE COUNCIL TO REQUEST YOUR AUTHORIZATION, TO BEGIN THE PROCESS.
AND THEN WHEN WE'RE READY TO SELL THE BONDS, WE WILL COME BACK FOR YOUR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE BOND PRICING AND THEN BUY AN ORDINANCE AT THE TIME.
SO TONIGHT STAFF IS SEEKING CITY COUNCILS AUTHORIZATION TO BEGIN THE PROCESS OF WORKING WITH THE CITY'S FINANCIAL ADVISOR BOND COUNSEL CREDIT RATING AGENCY BY AN UNDERWRITERS IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO ISSUE THE NEW DEBT, THE AMOUNT OF THE DEBT WILL BE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $37 MILLION.
THE TYPE OF DEBT WILL BE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS SERIES 2022.
THE PURPOSE FOR ISSUING THIS DEBT WILL BE TO PAY FOR THE COST OF DESIGN CONSTRUCTION AND FULLY FURNISHING THE CITY'S NEW PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER FACILITY.
OUR TENTATIVE SCHEDULE IS TO COME BACK BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 19TH, WHICH WILL BE OUR SECOND REGULARLY HELD COUNCIL MEETING IN JULY FOR A PUBLIC HEARING BOND PRICING AND MARKET REPORT APPROVAL OF THE BOND ORDINANCE AND APPROVAL BY COUNCIL OF ALL OF THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF THE BONDS MAYOR PRO TEM AND COUNCIL.
WE HAVE THE CITY'S FINANCIAL ADVISOR, MR. CHRIS ALLEN WITH RBC CAPITAL MARKETS HERE WITH US THIS EVENING, UH, TOGETHER.
WE'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING THIS AGENDA ITEM.
UM, ANY QUESTIONS, DISCUSSION THAT WAS OVER PARSLEY? I, EVERY TIME I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 31.
YEAH, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PARSLEY A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER, KALE.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE, ALL THOSE
[01:25:01]
OPPOSED MOTION PASSES.[32. Authorize the city manager or his designee to negotiate a contract with CoreOffice Interiors for the design, procurement and installation of furniture for thePublic Safety Center. ~ Bob Farmer, AG|CM]
NUMBER 30 TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH COURT.WAS IT CORE OFFICE INTERIORS FOR THE DESIGN PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLMENT OF FURNITURE FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER? A FARMER IS YOUR ITEM.
MAYOR PRO TEM AND CITY COUNCIL.
I'M A SENIOR PROGRAM MANAGER WITH DGCM.
SO BACK TO MY, WE PUT OUT A REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS, FOR FURNITURE PLANNING FIRMS TO ASSIST THE CITY IN PLANNING EACH ONE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY CENTERS SPACES AND HELP DESIGN AND IDENTIFY ALL THE FURNITURE NEEDS FOR THAT FACILITY.
UH, WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR YOU TO DO IS APPROVE A RANKING.
UM, WE RECEIVED FIVE HIGHLY QUALIFIED RESPONSES TO THAT.
UH, THEY WERE REVIEWED REFERENCES WERE CHECKED AND THEY WERE RANKED ACCORDINGLY CORE OFFICE INTERIORS WAS THE HIGHEST RANKED FIRM.
SO WHAT WE WERE ASKING TO DO IS, IS APPROVE THAT RANKING.
IT ALLOWS CITY MANAGER, OR IS DESIGNATED TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT NEGOTIATION WITH THAT FIRM THAT FIRM WOULD HELP US PLAN A DESIGN, IDENTIFY ALL THE FURNITURE ON BOTH THE CITY SIDE AND THE PD SIDE HELP US THROUGH THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS, WHICH THE CITY WOULD DO THROUGH ONE OF THE COOPERATIVE, UM, BUYING, UH CO-OPS AND THEN THEY WOULD RECEIVE AND INSTALL THE FURNITURE.
WE WILL BE BRINGING BACK THOSE CONTRACTS AND, OR PURCHASE ORDERS FOR THAT FURNITURE.
SO WE'RE REALLY JUST DOING A PLANNING SESSION WITH THIS PARTICULAR SOLICITATION, UM, JUST REALLY HIGHLY REGARDED FIRMS. ALL THE REFERENCES ARE GREAT.
WE COULDN'T HAVE GONE WRONG WITH ANY OF THEM FOR OFFICE INTERIORS ROSE TO THE TOP BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOME PREVIOUS POLICE DEPARTMENT EXPERIENCE.
THAT WAS REALLY THE ONLY EDGE THAT THEY HAD.
ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS ITEM? LET ME DISCUSSION ON SOME WORKABLE.
I'M LOOKING AT THE, UM, THE TRAINING ROOM FURNITURE, UM, IT'S THAT YOU HAVE SOME ATTACHMENTS THAT ARE ON TOP OF THE TABLE ITSELF WITH THOSE BEFORE MONITORS.
SO THOSE WERE EXISTING EXAMPLES OF THEIR PRACTICE, THEIR PAST PD EXPERIENCE.
THEY WERE JUST TRYING TO SHOW US, THIS IS WHAT THEY DID, NEW BRAUNFELS AND SAN MARCUS.
SO THEY WERE JUST IMAGES OF THE KIND OF THINGS THAT WE WOULD EXPECT TO SEE FOR OUR FACILITY.
SO WHAT THEY'RE SHOWING YOU IS NOT THE FURNITURE WE'RE GOING TO BE BUYING IT, JUST SAMPLES OF THEIR PRODUCT.
AND THOSE ARE EASILY TO BE MOVE AND TO BE TAKEN DOWN AND MOVED TO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS, TAKE ALL OF THAT WOULD COME OUT IN THE PLANNING PROCESS FOR WHATEVER THE CITY DESIRED.
THOSE WERE JUST EXAMPLES OF OTHER FACILITIES THAT THEY'VE DONE.
CAUSE I KNOW PEOPLE MOVE AROUND, THEY GET PROMOTED AND IF THEY NEED TO USE A DIFFERENT SPACE FOR THE DETECTIVES OR SOME OTHER AREAS.
SO I WOULD EXPECT, AND SO THE CITY IS GOING TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY, PROVIDE ALL THAT INPUT, THE PD AND THE CITY STAFF.
THEY'RE NOT TIED TO A CERTAIN MANUFACTURER OR A CERTAIN PIECE OF FURNITURE.
AND THAT'S ACTUALLY THE POINT I WAS GONNA MAKE.
AND I KNOW CHIEF AND CAPTAIN AND PERHAPS ANY OTHER DESIGNATED YOU'RE GOING TO BE CLOSELY INVOLVED IN THAT.
I KNOW WHO THAT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO YOU ALL.
AND, UH, I KNOW WE'VE LEANED ON YOU, CHIEF AND CAPTAIN, UH, AS WELL FOR A LOT OF INPUT ON THIS BUILDING.
UH, THAT'S SOMETHING I'M ACTUALLY VERY PROUD OF THAT WE'VE LEANED ON YOU ALL SO MUCH TO HAVE SO MUCH INPUT INTO THIS AND THAT ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE FFNE HERE.
SO, UH, WITH THAT BEING SAID, UH, YOU KNOW, I JUST WANT TO SAY REAL QUICK.
I KNOW WE HAVE HECM ON A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT PROJECTS.
UH, I'VE SAID THIS TO DAVID BEFORE.
I APPRECIATE YOU ALL BEING OUR BULLDOG OUT THERE, UH, BEING OUR, UM, AS OUR REPRESENTATIVE, UM, AND GETTING EVERYTHING, UH, FROM OUR POSITION, UH, OUT THERE AS BEST SHE CAN AND LOOKING OUT FOR EVERY DOLLAR AND GETTING THE BEST DEAL WE CAN AND EVERYTHING, ALL THE PROJECTS WE'VE ASSIGNED TO YOU ALL.
SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, I'D LIKE TO APPROVE THE AGENDA ITEM AS WRITTEN AGAIN, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COUNCIL.
MARELLA SENT A SECOND BY COUNCILOR, TOBY DOBIAS, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION, COUNCILMAN RAQUEL.
UM, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS THE CITY IS GOING TO CONTINUE TO PLAN TO DESIGN AND INSTALL ITEMS IN THIS PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING WITH WHAT WE PREVIOUSLY VOTED ON, WHICH WAS THAT ELECTED OFFICIALS WERE NOT TO BE HOUSED IN THIS BUILDING.
SO I KNOW THERE WAS GOING TO BE SOME OVERFLOW OF STAFF,
[01:30:01]
BUT AS FAR AS ELECTED OFFICIALS BEING IN THAT BUILDING, I'D LIKE THE PLANNING TO CONTINUE WITHOUT ELECTED OFFICIALS BEING IN THERE.WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND AND YOU HAD A DISCUSSION.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE, ALL THOSE OPPOSED.
[33. ( Second Reading ) An ordinance of the City of Kyle, Texas annexing 119.703 acresof land, more or less located at 1111 and 1113 Roland Lane, approximately 3,000’northwest of the intersection of IH-35 & Roland Lane in Hays County, Texasincluding the abutting streets, roadways, and rights-of-way into the corporatelimits of the City . (Edward Coster Bullock Jr. - ANNX-22-0017) ~ Will Atkinson,Senior Planner]
ALL RIGHT.AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 33 SECOND RADIO, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF KYLE TEXAS ANNEX SCENE 119 ACRES 0.7, THREE ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS LOCATED AT 1111 AT 11 11 13 ROLAND LANE, APPROXIMATELY 3000 NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
IS YOUR ITEM OR WILL, WOULD THAT BE YOURS? OKAY.
UH, WELL, I CAN, SINCE YOU YOU'RE PLANNING FOR THE RECORD, UH, THIS IS THE FIRST OF THE NEXT THREE ITEMS ARE RELATING TO THIS PROJECT.
UH, THIS IS THE SECOND READ FOR THE ANNEXATION.
THE FOLLOWING ITEM WILL BE THE ZONING ASSOCIATED WITH IT.
AND THE LAST ONE, IT WILL BE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS WELL.
ANY DISCUSSION TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 33, UM, EMOTIONAL BUT WERE KILLED.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER BRADSHAW? ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE, ALL THOSE OPPOSED.
[34. ( First Reading ) An ordinance amending Chapter 53 (Zoning) of the City of Kyle,Texas, for the purpose of rezoning approximately 87.694 acres of land from ‘A’ to‘R-1-C’ (Residential Condominium, 30.565 acres), ‘R-1-3’ (Single FamilyResidential – 3, 26.322 acres), ‘R-1-2’ (Single Family Residential – 2, 19.130acres) & ‘CC’ (Community Commercial, 11.677 acres) for property located at1111 & 1113 Roland Lane, in Hays County, Texas. (Edward Coster Bullock Jr. -Zoning -Z-22-0094) ~ Will Atkinson, Senior Planner]
NUMBER 34.FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 53 ZONING OF THE CITY OF KYLE TEXAS FOR THE PURPOSE OF REZONING, APPROXIMATELY EIGHT SEVEN POINT 6,694 ACRES OF LAND FROM A, FROM A TO RONC R ONE THREE, RESIDENTIAL THREE TO SIX ACRES ARE ONE, TWO AND 1 9, 3, SORRY, CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, UH, 11.67 ACRES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT I I 11, 11 AND 1113 ROLLING LANE IN HAYES COUNTY, TEXAS.
UH, WELL, I CAN SEE YOU'RE PLANNING FOR THE RECORD.
UH, THIS IS THE FOLLOW-UP ITEM FOR THE ANNEXATION RELATED TO THIS PROJECT.
UH, THEY ARE WANTING TO HAVE A COMBINATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS THAT ARE WANTING TO BE DEVELOPED.
UM, A MIX OF CONDOMINIUM, RESIDENTIAL, UH, 50 FOOT WIDE, UH, SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL, LOTS OF 65 FOOT WIDE, SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ALONG THE PRE THE GENERAL BOUNDARY OF WHERE, UM, THE FM ONE 10 BYPASS IS GOING TO GO.
UH, ALL THESE, ALL THESE ZONING DISTRICTS ARE, CAN BE CONSIDERED, UH, FOR OUR CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
AND, UM, BUT THE FOLLOWUP INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WILL BE DEVELOPED WITH THIS PROJECT, UM, CAN BE SUPPORTED AS WELL.
SO IT'S STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS ZONING IS APPROVED.
THIS AUTUMN HAS A PUBLIC HEARING.
WE'LL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC, HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE COME FORWARD.
SEE, NOW WE'LL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UM, THE, UH, DISCUSSION THAT WAS REMEMBER BRADSHAW MAYOR PRO TEM.
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 38 34 0 34 34 44.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER, A BRADSHAW AND A SECOND BY COUNCILOR FLORES, KALE.
UH, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION RIGHT HERE? REMEMBER? THERE'LL BE YES.
UM, SO BASICALLY WHAT THERE, THE LANDOWNER WAS APPROACHED AND WANTS TO DIVIDE UP IN FOUR DIFFERENT AREAS, CORRECT? YES, SIR.
UM, THEY'RE THERE, THEY DO HAVE A DEVELOPERS INTERESTED IN THE PROPERTY, BUT THE, WITH THE, UH, WITH THE APPLICATION THAT LAND OWNER HIMSELF HAS PROVIDED THE APPLICATION FOR A REZONING AND WHAT HAVE YOU.
SO THEY ARE THE LEGAL ENTITY ON THE APPLICATION.
DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA IF, UM, WHEN IT COMES TO ROLLING LANE ITSELF, YOU KNOW, WITH, WITH, DO WE HAVE AN ESTIMATE OF HOW MANY CONDOMINIUMS OR HOUSING UNITS THEY'RE LOOKING AT BUILDING OUT THERE RIGHT OFF THE BAT? IT'S GENERALLY AROUND THREE TO FOUR PER BUILD-ABLE ACRE.
UM, THEY ARE LOOKING AT, UM, IN, AND THEY'RE LOOKING AT THREE TO FOUR PER BILLABLE ACRE.
SO THE CONDOMINIUMS THEMSELVES, UM, AT MAX WOULD BE IN THE A HUNDRED, 120 RANGE PROBABLY.
UM, THE, THEY ALSO THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE, UM, TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ROADS, SIDEWALKS, AND TREES AND ALL, AND ALL THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT GOES IN AS
[01:35:01]
WELL.SO THAT HAS TO BE SUBTRACTED AS WELL.
THE DISCUSSION SOUND CUSTOMER ELLISON IS THEY REQUEST YOU'RE HERE.
SO WHAT DISCUSSIONS HAVE YOU ALL HAD WITH THE CITY? I'M ASSUMING STAFF ABOUT LANDING ON THESE, UH, ASK ESSENTIALLY.
SO WE'VE HAD CLOSE CORRESPONDENCE WITH, UM, WITH THE CITY REPRESENTATIVES.
UM, WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THE VARIETY OF PRODUCT AND HOW THAT ALIGNS WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WHAT IS, UM, ENVISIONED FOR THIS AREA.
UM, IT SEEMS TO BE SUPPORTIVE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, UM, AS WELL MENTIONED, THERE'S GOING TO BE A VARIETY OF ZONINGS, UM, BOTH CONDOMINIUM, TOWNHOME AND SINGLE FAMILY.
UM, ALONG WITH COMMERCIAL AT THE HARD CORNER, YOU SAID TOWNHOME, I DID NOT SEE THAT IN, UH, AS A PART OF THE REQUEST, BUT THAT IS SOMETHING YOU ALL ARE LOOKING AT AS WELL.
I DO SEE YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF LOTS LISTED UP HERE IN THE REQUEST LETTER.
UM, I DO LIKE THE VARIETY I'LL I'LL SAY THAT, UM, I WAS NOT AWARE THAT, UH, THE TOWNHOMES WOULD BE A PART OF THAT.
THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I KNOW THE COUNCIL IS PROBABLY GETTING TIRED OF ME ADVOCATING FOR IN THE PAST THAT VARIETY AND HOUSING STOCK I'VE BEEN ADVOCATING THIS FOR PAST SEVEN YEARS SINCE I WAS ON PLANNING AND ZONING, UM, TO GET THEM MORE OF A VARIETY AND A HOUSING PRODUCT IN THE CITY.
SO I AM AT LEAST EXCITED ABOUT THAT PART.
ANYONE ELSE IN OTHER DISCUSSION, I'VE GOT A QUESTION.
DO WE KNOW IF THEY'RE GOING TO DO ANY IMPROVEMENTS ON ROLLING LANE IN THAT AREA? WILL SO EARLY ON WHEN THEY CAME IN WANTING TO DEVELOP THE SITE, UH, WE HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH, UH, IT WAS PRETTY MUCH A ROUND TABLE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM, UM, ON THE PRIVATE SIDE, ALSO WITH PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING, UH, PLANNING, UM, THIS IS THE CITY MANAGER AS WELL.
UM, THERE'LL BE MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE DRAINAGE THAT COMES ONTO THEIR SITE, WHERE IT CROSSES ROLAND LANE.
SO THERE'S GOING TO BE A PORTION OF THAT SECTION RIGHT THERE, WHERE THEY'LL BE MAKING IMPROVEMENTS AS APPROPRIATE, CAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE COMING OFF OF THE K 50 SUBDIVISION JUST TO THE NORTH, UM, AS AN OVERALL REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE FROM ROLAND LANE AND IMPROVEMENTS.
UM, IT WAS DECIDED THAT THAT IS MORE OF A CITY CIP BECAUSE, UH, THERE'S A LOT OF DRAINAGE THAT HAS TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF IT.
THAT ALSO GOES ALL THE WAY DOWN, UM, OLD POST ROAD AS WELL.
AND WITH REQUIREMENTS TO PULL MOST OF ROWAN LANE UP OUT OF, UM, IT'S NOT NECESSARILY FLOOD PLAIN, BUT TO BE ABLE TO EFFECTIVELY DRAIN IT PROPERLY WITH THE STAFF, DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE TO COME BACK LATER WITH A BRAND NEW ROAD AND HAVE TO TEAR IT UP AND START ALL OVER AGAIN.
THAT'S ACTUALLY A GREAT ASSESSMENT I'VE BEEN OUT THERE WHEN IT'S FLOODING.
BUT I'M GLAD THAT THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE CARE OF PART OF THAT FLOODING ISSUE IN THEIR AREA.
SORRY, DO WE HAVE A MOTION I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBERS, 35.
ALL WE HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER, A PARSLEY, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED MOTION PASSES.
FIVE ONE ACTUALLY I DON'T PARTY SEX.
SCOTT WASN'T IT AS A ZONING ITEM.
YEAH, BECAUSE IT WAS A PUBLIC HEARING.
ITEM NUMBER 36 SECOND READING AN ORDINANCE OF CITY OF KYLE TEXAS, SIR.
UH, 35 IS THE DEVELOPMENT ROOM AND ASSOCIATED WITH THE, WITH THE ZONING AND THE 35, CORRECT? YEP.
WE HAVE NOT DONE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
[35. Consider and possible action on a development agreement by and between theCity of Kyle, Texas and Edward Coster Bullock, Jr. ~ Will Atkinson, SeniorPlanner]
SO NOW WE'RE AN ITEM 35.CONSIDER POSSIBLE ACTION ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY, BY
[01:40:01]
AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF KYLE, TEXAS AND EDWARD, UH, COSTER BULLOCK JR.WILL I CAN SEND YOU SEE, YOU'RE PLAYING FOR THE RECORD.
A MAJORITY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS FOCUSING ON INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATED WITH THE, WITH THE PROJECT.
WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE MEMORIALIZED IT, UH, RELATED TO THE OFFSITE WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS, UH, TO THEIR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR DRAINAGE.
UH, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THERE WAS A MASONRY FENCE, UM, ALONG ROLAND LANE.
UM, ONE THAT WOULDN'T USUALLY, IT'S A WOODEN FENCE THAT ROTS.
UH, WE WANTED TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT AS FOR THE VIBE TRAIL AND, UH, UH, DECORATIVE ENTRANCE INTO THE PROJECT AS WELL.
UM, AND, AND EVERYTHING ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
SO, UH, THE OTHER SIDE OF IT, WE ALSO PUT IN SOME MASONRY STANDARDS THAT, UM, THAT WE WANTED TO ENFORCE FROM A, FROM A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERSPECTIVE, UM, IN THAT AS WELL, THAT GOOD, ANY, UH, DISCUSSION.
I JUST WANT TO ADD A LITTLE BIT, I'M GLAD ABOUT THE MASONRY FENCE, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT'S ADJACENT TO A RURAL AREA.
I KNOW WE'RE HAVING AN ISSUE RIGHT NOW ON A, A REALLY POORLY DESIGNED FENCE AND BUILD FENCE AND IT'S EQUAL AGAINST THE RURAL AREA AND WE'RE HAVING TROUBLE WITH LIVESTOCK.
SO I'M GLAD THAT WE WERE, UH, AS A CITY, UM, LOOK AT DOING SOMETHING BETTER IN THIS AREA.
SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR DOING THAT.
AND WITH THAT, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 35, GOT A SECOND BY A COUNCIL MEMBER, BRADSHAW, ANY DISCUSSION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY, AYE, ALL THOSE OPPOSED.
[36. ( Second Reading ) An ordinance of the City of Kyle, Texas annexing 176.023 acresof land, more or less, located at 5260 Hillside Terrace, in Hays County, Texasincluding the abutting streets, roadways, and rights-of-way into the corporatelimits of the City. (Hillside Terrace/Porter Country - ANNX-21-0015) ~ WillAtkinson, Senior Planner]
I'M NUMBER 36 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF KYLE, TEXAS ANNEXING, 176.02, THREE ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, UH, LOCATED AT 52 26 HILLSIDE TERRORISTS AND HAYES COUNTY, TEXAS, INCLUDING THE ABUNDANT STREETS ROADWAYS.AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS INTO THE CORPORATE, UH, CITY LIMITS CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY.
UM, MR. WILKINSON IS YOUR ITEM AS WELL.
THIS IS ESSENTIALLY THE SECOND READING, UH, AS STATED, UM, FOR, UM, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 36.
UH, THIS IS A ONE OF TWO ANNEXATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH A HILLSIDE TERRACE, UH, PORTER COUNTRY, UM, PROJECT.
AND I'LL JUST THROW IT UP ON THE SCREEN SO EVERYBODY CAN GET A VISUAL.
IT WILL ALSO HAVE AN ASSOCIATED XONE, UH, FOLLOWING UP ON THIS, UH, AS A NEXT AGENDA ITEM AND THEN ALSO THE, UH, UM, ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS WELL.
UM, DISCUSSION MAYOR ELECTRICAL AND MAKE IT A MOTION TO APPROVE VIA A GENOME AND A 36 SECOND.
WE'VE GOT A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER.
TOBIA SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER ELLISON, ANY DISCUSSION CAUSE OF HER ELLISON.
UH, I JUST WANTED TO SAY, YOU KNOW, I KNOW THERE'S BEEN A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT CONVERSATIONS ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR TRACK.
UM, YOU KNOW, I WAS VERY PLEASED AT, UH, ONE PARTICULAR THING IN GENERAL.
ONE, THERE WAS A LOT OF GOOD THINGS THAT WERE ADDED AND, AND DISCUSS TO MAKE THIS, UH, PROJECT TO THE GOLD STANDARD THAT WE EXPECT HERE IN KYLE.
BUT I DID WANT TO, I WOULD BE REMISSED IF I DIDN'T ACKNOWLEDGE MR. MCELRATH, UH, FOR YOUR EFFORTS, UH, WHAT THE, UH, ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS AND EVEN IN, UH, DEVELOPMENTS NEXT TO YOUR, UH, PROJECT AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU AND TO WORK, TO TRY TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS.
AND, UH, I CERTAINLY RESPECT THAT AND I APPRECIATE THAT.
AND SO, UH, I LIKE TO SUPPORT THIS DISCUSSION.
WE'VE GOT A MOTION AND SECOND, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
THOSE OPPOSED SAY NAY MOTION PASSES FIVE.
[37. ( Second Reading ) An ordinance of the City of Kyle, Texas annexing 82.951 acresof land, more or less, located on FM 2001, approximately 500' north of WindyHill Road, in Hays County, Texas including the abutting streets, roadways, andrights-of-way into the corporate limits of the City. (Hillside Terrace/PorterCountry - ANNX-21-0016) ~ Will Atkinson, Senior Planner]
ALL RIGHT.37 SECOND REGIONAL NOR DOES THE CITY OF COW, UH, ANNEX SEEN 82.9, 500 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS LOCATED FM 2001, APPROXIMATELY 500, UH, NORTH OF WINDY HILL ROAD IN HAYES, COUNTY, TEXAS, INCLUDING THE BUDDING STREETS, UH, ROADWAYS AND RIGHT AWAY INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY.
UM, WELL ATKINS IS YOUR ITEM AS WELL.
SO THIS IS THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE TWO ANNEXATIONS RELATED TO THE POORER COUNTRY, UH, PROJECT.
AND I'LL JUST THROW IT OUT THERE ON THE SCREEN.
[01:45:29]
ALL RIGHT.SO EVERYTHING IN THE YELLOW BOUNDARY, THE RED IS JUST WHAT WAS ANNEXED FOR WRAPPING IT UP.
AND SO THE YELLOW BOUNDARIES, THE REST OF IT, UH, COUNCILOR RICO, YES.
I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 37 SECOND.
WE'VE GOT A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN RAQUEL A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER ELLISON, EIGHT DISCUSSION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE, ALL THOSE OPPOSED MOTION PASSES.
[38. ( First Reading ) An ordinance amending Chapter 53 (Zoning) of the City of Kyle,Texas, for the purpose of rezoning approximately 259 acres of land fromAgriculture 'A' to Planned Unit Development 'PUD' for property located at 5260Hillside Terrace, in Hays County, Texas. (Hillside Terrace Development LLC -Zoning - Z-21-0090) ~ Will Atkinson, Senior Planner]
ALRIGHT, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 38.FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE, MANY CHAPTER 53 ZONING OF THE CITY OF KYLE TEXAS FOR THE PURPOSE OF REZONING, APPROXIMATELY 259 ACRES OF LAND FROM AGRICULTURE, A TWO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 50 TO 60 HILLSIDE TERRORISTS THAT HE'S COUNTY, TEXAS.
UH, WILL I CONSIDER THIS IS YOUR ITEM.
WILL I CONSIDER YOUR POINTER FOR THE RECORD? UM, I'VE THROWN THE, UH, THE PUD ZONING MAPS SPECIFICALLY UP ON THE SCREEN.
UH, THIS IS THE ZONING FALLING AND THE TWO ANNEXATIONS.
UM, IT IS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, WHICH MEANS THERE'S FLEXIBILITY BUILT INTO IT.
UM, FROM A, FROM A CODE PERSPECTIVE, UM, THEY HAVE APPROXIMATELY 257 ACRES OF, UM, OF RNA AND 1.7 ACRES OF RETAIL SERVICES, UM, IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROJECT.
SO AROUND IT, THERE'S GOING TO BE DIFFERENT, UM, STYLES OF, OF RESIDENCES.
SOME OF THEM
THEY'RE GONNA HAVE A MASSIVE, MASSIVE PUBLIC PARK WITH THE BIKE TRAIL SYSTEM IN IT.
AND THEY'VE, UH, THEY'VE ALSO SCATTERED, UH, OTHER PUBLIC PARKS AND PRIVATE PARKS ASSOCIATED TO THE PROJECT AS WELL.
THEY HAVE A LOT OF STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS THEY'RE GOING TO DO.
AND OVERALL, THIS PROJECT IS, IT'S A REALLY NICE PROJECT.
WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THEM FOR OVER A YEAR ON IT.
AND SO, UH, WE'RE, WE'RE PLEASED TO PRESENT.
THIS IS THAT A MAN HAS A PUBLIC HEARING WILL NOW OPEN TO PUBLIC, HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK, PLEASE COME FORWARD NOW, SEE NONE.
WE WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, UH, ANY DISCUSSION WHERE ELLISON.
SO, UM, ONCE AGAIN, SECOND, THE STATEMENT TOMATO EARLIER, BUT THERE IS A POND IN THIS DEVELOPMENT, CORRECT? YES, SIR.
AND WE'VE TALKED ABOUT, UM, IS IN OUR BUDGET WORKSHOPS AS WELL AS OTHER PLACES WITH AERATION OF THE POND IS THAT TO BE EXPECTED IN THIS POND AS WELL, MARY POND WATER LEVEL, SO IT CAN SERVE AS FULL-TIME AND NOT JUST A DETENTION POT AND YOUR HAVE YOU PAID FANTASTIC.
AND JUST FOR THE RECORD FOR THOSE WATCHING, HE DID CONFIRM THAT.
UH, SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, UH, I LIKE TO PROVE THE AGENDA ITEM IS WRITTEN, SORRY, WE'VE GOT A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN ELLISON SECOND BY COUNCILMAN KALE.
I JUST WANT TO THANK
IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S ALWAYS NEEDED IN OUR PONDS AND, UH, IT'S FOR SAFETY REASONS AS WELL.
SO THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT FORWARD.
UM, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY, AYE, THOSE OPPOSED SAY NAY MOTION PASSES 600, UH, NOPE.
AND YOUR REJECTION SEEING THERE'S NONE WE'VE FINALLY PASSED.
[39. Consider and possible action on a development agreement by and between theCity of Kyle, Texas and Hillside Terrace Development, LLC. ~ Paige Saenz, CityAttorney]
I DON'T REMEMBER.39 CONSIDER IMPOSSIBLE ACTION ON A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY THE, BY IN BETWEEN THE CITY OF KYLE, TEXAS AND HILLSIDE TERRORIST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, UH, ATTORNEY, UH, BARBARA, IT'S THE PAGE SIGNS.
I CAN TAKE IT EITHER, RIGHT? I CAN TALK ABOUT A LITTLE BIT AND IF YOU WANT TO EXPOUND AND THAT'S FINE, TOO, WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO.
UM, TH THIS IS A COMBINATION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATED TO THEIR SPECIAL FINANCING DISTRICT WITH A PID, AND ALSO A LOT OF, UH, SUBDIVISION RELATED IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE ASKED THEM TO DO AS WELL FOR ONSITE AND ONSITE, UH, WITH A LARGE FOCUS ON THE VIBE, THEY ARE DOING A MASSIVE, MASSIVE EXTENSION OF OUR VIBE TRAIL SYSTEM, PLUS PROVIDING MONEY FOR AREAS THAT THEY CAN'T GET TO TO EXTEND IT DOWN TO WINDY HILL ROAD.
UM, AND THE, THE ALLOWANCE FOR A PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE DISTRICT TO ACCOUNT FOR THAT IS MAKING THIS PROJECT FANTASTIC.
SO, UM, THAT'S, THAT'S IT IN A NUTSHELL SOUNDED GOOD TO ME.
[01:50:01]
OKAY.ANY DISCUSSION COUNCIL MEMBER PARSLEY? UM, I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU TO, UH, HE'LL FIGHT TERRORIST DEVELOPERS, BECAUSE YOU GUYS DID A GREAT JOB EXPLAINING EVERYTHING, UM, CHANGING THE THINGS THAT NEEDED TO BE CHANGED AND LISTENING TO COUNSEL'S CONCERN THAT LIST AT THAT, THAT SAME QUESTION.
SO YOU GUYS ARE BRINGING A GREAT PROJECT THAT I AM VERY EXCITED TO SEE BEING ACCOMPLISHED.
SO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THAT.
AND SECTION DAYS, AS THE PARTIES INTEND THAT THE WATER SERVICE TO THE PROPERTY WILL BE PROVIDED BY CO FOR SPECIAL UTILITY, UM, SERVICE, WHERE THEY'LL BE, I GUESS IN THE TIME WE GET A NEGOTIATE RATES WITH HIM, THAT'S, THAT'S WHERE THE WATER IS GOING TO BE COMING FROM THEM.
IT'S A PRIVATE UTILITY WHERE THEY'LL BE RECEIVING THEIR WATER.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? DO WE HAVE A MOTION CAUSE RELISTEN, UH, I LIKE TO MOVE TO APPROVE THE AGENDA ITEM IS WRITTEN.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY CUSTOMER ELLISON.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED MOTION PASSES.
[40. Consideration and Possible Action on a Resolution of the City of Kyle, Texas,Approving an Amendment to the Kyle 57 Public Improvement District within theCity of Kyle pursuant to Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code. ~ JonSnyder, P3Works, LLC, City's PID Administrator]
TONIGHT.I'M GOING TO 40 CONSIDERING POSSIBLE ACTION OF, OF RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CALTEX IS APPROVING AND AMENDING TO THE CAR.
57 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WITHIN THE CITY OF KYLE TEXAS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3 72 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.
UH, THIS ITEM HAS A PUBLIC HEARING.
UH, MR. PROTON COUNSEL WITH JOHN SNYDER WITH B3 WORKS, THE CITY'S PIT ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE RECORD, UH, COUNSEL HAD PREVIOUSLY, UH, ACCEPTED A PETITION, INCREASING THE COST ESTIMATED COST OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8 MILLION TO 9 MILLION AND CALLING THE PUBLIC HEARINGS.
SO THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN ULTIMATELY THE VOTE, UH, TO AMEND THE, UH, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FROM 8 MILLION TO $9 MILLION.
DOES THAT ITEM HAS A PUBLIC HEARING, UM, ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE COME FORWARD.
THEONINE WILL NOT CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ANY DISCUSSION.
DO I HAVE A MOTION? JUST TO CLARIFY, MR. SNYDER, COULD YOU JUST BRIEFLY SAY WHAT THE ADDITIONAL COSTS WE'LL DO WITH THE IMPROVEMENT? SURE.
SO IT'S, IT'S REALLY INCREASING THE CAP FROM 8 MILLION TO 9 MILLION.
THE ACTUAL, UH, WHAT'S GOING TO BE IN THE OFFERING DOCUMENT, I THINK IS CLOSER TO EIGHT, EIGHT, 8,358,000.
IF THERE'S INTEREST SAVINGS OR SOMETHING THAT MIGHT GO UP SLIGHTLY, BUT WE'RE ANTICIPATING IT BEING IN CLOSER TO THE DATE $0.3 MILLION NUMBER AND THOSE COSTS, IT'S NOT ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS.
IT'S REALLY RELATED TO COST OVERRUNS THAT HAVE BEEN GOING ON, YOU KNOW, DISCUSSION MOTION TO APPROVE BECAUSE WE HAVE A MOTION BY OR THE PARTY.
WE'VE GOT A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW SECOND BY COUNCILMAN
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE, ALL THOSE OPPOSED MOTION PASSES.
[41. Consideration and Possible Action on a Resolution Approving an Amendment tothe Kyle 57 Public Improvement District Financing Agreement within the City ofKyle pursuant to Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code. ~ Jon Snyder,P3Works, LLC, City's PID Administrator]
ALRIGHT.NUMBER, ITEM, NUMBER 41 CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AMENDING TO THE COL 57 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FINANCING AGREEMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF KYLE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3 72 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.
UM, ANY DISCUSSION WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY PRESENTATION? YEAH, IT'S REALLY THE SAME THING.
IT'S JUST AMENDING THE FINANCING AGREEMENT TO MAKE IT MATCH.
AND THEN ALSO ADDING IN REPRESENTATIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY STATUTE LIKE THE NON BOYCOTT OF ISRAEL AND THINGS ALONG THOSE LINES WAS GOOD.
WE'VE GOT A MOTION BY A COUNCIL NELSON SECOND BY COUNCILMAN POPE PARSLEY.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE, ALL THOSE OPPOSED.
SIX OH, JEANETTE AND 47 CONSIDERING POSSIBLE ACTION ON 42.
SORRY, BECAUSE IT WAS GETTING LATE.
I'VE BEEN, I'VE BEEN WORKING ALL DAY AND READING, SO YEAH, DEFINITELY.
I REALLY THOUGHT IT WAS A LOT LATER THAN THAT.
I HAVEN'T LOOKED UP AT THE CLOCK,
[42. Consideration and Possible Action on approval of a Completion Agreement withKyle 57 Development, Inc. ~ Jon Snyder, P3Works, LLC, City's PIDAdministrator]
UM, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON APPROVAL APPROVAL OF THE COMPLICATION AGREEMENT WITH CAL 57 DEVELOPMENT.SO THIS IS THE COMPLETION AGREEMENT.
THIS IS EFFECTIVELY GUARANTEEING THAT THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S CONTEMPLATED WOULD BE FINANCED WITH THE PYD IS GOING TO BE COMPLETED.
AND SO THE WAY THAT THIS WORKS IS THAT WE'RE ESTIMATING IT'S ABOUT A $1.1 MILLION DELTA BETWEEN THE TOTAL COST
[01:55:01]
OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND WHAT CAN BE FUNDED BY THE BONDS.THEY HAVE TO PUT THAT IN THE GROUND FIRST, BEFORE THEY CAN START DRAWING ON THE PROJECT FUNDS.
SO WE KNOW THAT BETWEEN THE MONEY THAT'S ALREADY BEEN SPENT IN THE GROUND AND THE PROJECT FUND, WE CAN GET THE INFRASTRUCTURE COMPLETED IN DISCUSSION BECAUSE WE'RE BE US.
I HAVE TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE AS WRITTEN.
UH, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW AND YOUR DISCUSSION.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE, ALL THOSE OPPOSED.
[43. Consideration and Possible Action on a Resolution Approving the Form andAuthorizing the Distribution of a Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum forCity of Kyle, Texas Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 ( Kyle 57Public Improvement District). ~ Jon Snyder, P3Works, LLC, City's PIDAdministrator]
ITEM NUMBER 43 CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FORM OF AN AUTHORIZING THE DISTRIBUTION OF A PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR US CITY OF KYLE, TEXAS, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2022.IT WAS A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.
UH, JOHN SNYDER THE ZEROS AS WELL, RIGHT? SO THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR THE BONDS.
UH, AS I MENTIONED, IT WAS ABOUT 8 MILLION, $358,000.
UH, THIS IS SUMMARIZING THE, THE FULL TRANSACTION.
AND IF THERE'S ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, YOU'VE GOT THE WHOLE TEAM HERE FROM THE DEVELOPER TO FMS BONDS, UH, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS AND, UH, BIGGER SELF BICKERSTAFF.
YOU'VE STILL GOT TO ACOSTA AS BOND COUNSEL, HE DISCUSSION ANY QUESTIONS.
MOTIONS, MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 43 IS WRITTEN SECOND, GOT A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER ELLISON AND A SECOND BY COUNSELOR POSTS, PARSLEY.
UM, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
BUT THOSE AGAINST MOTION PASSES.
[44. Consideration and Possible Action on a Resolution Accepting a PreliminaryService and Assessment Plan for the Kyle 57 Public Improvement District;Directing the Filing of a Proposed Assessment Roll for said Public ImprovementDistrict; Approving the Publication of Notice of a Public Hearing to Consider anOrdinance Levying Assessments on Property Located within Said PublicImprovement District that is Specially Benefitted by the Improvements beingFinanced; Directing City Staff to Publish and Mail Notice of Said Public Hearing;and Resolving Other Matters Incident and Related Thereto; and Providing anEffective Date. ~ Jon Snyder, P3Works, LLC, City's PID Administrator]
ITEM NUMBER 44, CONSIDERING POSSIBLE ACTION ON A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR THE CAL 47 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DIRECTING THE FILING OF A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROW FOR THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, APPROVING THE PUBLICATIONS OF NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE LEVINE ASSESSMENTS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE THIRD PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT THAT IS SPECIFICALLY BENEFITED BY THE IMPROVEMENTS BEING, UH, FINANCE, DIRECTING CITY STAFF, AND PUBLISH OF A MAIL NOTICES OF SAID PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTIONS OTHER MATTERS, INDICATED AND RELATED THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.JOHN SNYDER'S IS YOUR ITEM AS WELL.
SO THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN.
THIS DOESN'T ACTUALLY LET YOU THE ASSESSMENTS IT'S REALLY THE PURPOSES.
UH, SO IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS, IT'LL BE NOTICED IN THE NEWSPAPER AND ALSO NOTICE SENT OUT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS.
IF THEY HAVE QUESTIONS THEY CAN COME IN AND INSPECT THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN AND ASSESSMENT ROLE.
UH, THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE UPDATED AFTER WE HAVE FINAL PRICING.
SO IN TWO WEEKS THEY'LL ACTUALLY PRICE THE BONDS.
WE'LL TAKE THAT PRICING INFORMATION AND UPDATE ALL THE NUMBERS IN THE DOCUMENT, UH, THAT AFTERNOON.
AND THEN THAT'LL BE PRESENTED TO COUNCIL, UH, THE SAME EVENING DISCUSSION.
SCOTT, WHAT ACTION DO WE HAVE TO DO? THIS IS JUST A READING OR DO WE HAVE TO TAKE ACTION ON IT? IT NEEDS TO BE A PR RESOLUTION HAS TO BE APPROVED.
MAY I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE 44 IS WRITTEN, WE'VE GOT A MOTION WITH COUNSELOR
UM, SO WHEN WE DO THE PUBLICATION, IS THAT GOING TO BE LIKE THROUGH THE NEWSPAPER OR SOCIAL MEDIA OR IS IT GONNA BE POSTED SIGNS OR JUST, HOW WOULD IT GO ABOUT IN THE NEWSPAPER AND ALSO MAILED TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS, MALE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE DISTRICT.
YEAH, THE DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
[45. Calling a Public Hearing to Issue Special Assessment Revenue Bonds in the Kyle57 Public Improvement District. ~ Jon Snyder, P3Works, LLC, City's PIDAdministrator]
ITEM NUMBER 44, CALL A PUBLIC HEARING TO ISSUE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, REVENUE, BONDS, AND THE KYLE 57 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.REALLY NOTHING TO ADD ON THAT.
IT'S SIMPLY CALLING THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ISSUE THE BONDS.
WE NEED TO MAKE A MOTION THOUGH.
CORRECT? UM, SO IN IT'S, UH, AGENDA ITEM 45, 45, THEY WERE ON, UM, MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 45 IS WRITTEN, GOT A MOTION BY COUNCIL MORELLA CENTER.
SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER, RED SHAWL, ELL DISCUSSION.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE, ALL THOSE OPPOSED MOTION PASSES.
[VIII. Executive Session]
SO WE'VE GOT TO GO BACK TO, UH, OKAY.[02:00:03]
JUST, JUST THE ITEMS THAT WERE LACKING IT JUST ONE ITEM, JUST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 5, 5, 1 TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE.THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CONVENIENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION FROM TIME TO TIME AS DEEMED NECESSARY.
DURING THIS MEETING, THE CITY COUNCIL MAY CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO ANY LAWFUL EXCEPTION CONTAINING CHAPTER 5, 5, 1 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, INCLUDING ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING TOPICS.
IT'S WITH PENDING AND CONTEMPLATED LITIGATION OR TO SEEK THEIR ADVICE AT THE CITY ATTORNEY PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, 5 1 0 7 1.
I GOT A SESSION ALL STAGECOACH ROAD, LLC VERSUS CITY OF TEXAS.
SO THERE WAS NO ACTION TAKEN DURING EXECUTIVE SESSION B NO ACTION TAKEN.
NOW, DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? MOTION TO ADJOURN.
SECOND, WE'VE GOT A MOTION BY COUNCIL WHERE THERE'LL BE A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER PARSLEY.