[1. Call Meeting To Order]
[00:00:07]
I'D LIKE TO CALL THIS A REGULARLY SCHEDULED PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER.
CAN WE HAVE A ROLL CALL PLEASE? TIMMINS MARTHA SNYDER.
[3. Citizen Comments]
NEXT, UM, CITIZEN COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.IF THERE'S ANY, UH, CITIZENS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, WE ASK THAT YOU, UH, COME UP TO THE MIC.
NOW YOU CAN, UM, HAVE UP TO THREE MINUTES.
PLEASE ALSO FILL OUT A CITIZEN COMMENTS FORM WHEN YOU ARE ABLE, DOES ANYONE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK? YOU MAY COME UP NOW.
I'M GOING TO ENCLOSE CITIZEN COMMENTS.
THIS IS THE COMMENTS IS NOW CLOSED.
[4. Consent]
ITEM NUMBER FOUR, CONSENT AGENDA.WE HAVE CONSENT A THROUGH H WITH A MOTION.
WE APPROVE THE CONSENT ITEM AGENDA ITEM FOUR SECOND.
IT'S BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER JAMES SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER TIMMINS.
UM, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT MOTION? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
I'LL POST A CONSENT AGENDA PASSES.
[A.
Consider a request to construct an approximately 1,791 square foot, free standing Waffle House building and site plan for property located at 5767 Kyle Parkway within the I-35 zoning overlay district. (Waffle House - CUP-22-0055)
]NEXT ITEM FIVE, CONSIDERING POSSIBLE ACTION.FIVE A CONSIDER REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 1,791 SQUARE FOOT FREE-STANDING WAFFLE HOUSE BUILDING AND SITE PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5 7 6 7 KYLE PARKWAY WITHIN THE
UH, MS. SHARP, KAYLA SHARP CITY PLANNER FOR THE RECORD.
UM, THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO BUILD A FREE-STANDING WAFFLE HOUSE AT, SORRY, SHARE MY SCREEN REAL QUICK.
AT 5 7, 6, 7 KYLE PARKWAY, UM, IT'S RIGHT BEHIND THE WALGREENS ON KYLE PARKWAY AT THE INTERSECTION OF KYLE PARKWAY AND THE LOWE'S ACCESS ROAD.
IT IS WITHIN THE
UM, IT'S ZONED RETAIL SERVICES.
SO THERE'S NO ISSUE WITH ZONING THERE, UM, THAT SUPPORTS THE, UM, INDOOR DINING SERVICE.
UM, SO, UM, THE PROPOSED BUILDING NEEDS THE INTENT OF RETAIL SERVICES AND THE
WE HAVE REVIEWED IT FOR MATERIALS, COLORS, UM, ALL OF THAT STUFF.
AND, UM, IS CODE COMPLIANT AND EXCEEDS THE REQUIREMENT FOR A MINIMUM OF 90% MASONRY.
UM, SO STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ELEVATIONS AND, UM, RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND CAN SHARE THE ELEVATIONS REALLY QUICK.
SO THEY HAVE THE MASONRY ON ALL FOUR SIDES, UM, REMOVED THE TRADITIONAL, I THINK IT'S RED BANDING AROUND THE SIDE AND JUST KEPT WITH THE RED AWNING.
AND THEN SITE PLAN, UM, IT'S BEEN REVIEWED FOR ALL OF THE SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS, PARKING, EVERYTHING LIKE THAT.
UM, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT? THANK YOU.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO.
UM, I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THAT.
UM, WITH THE THERE'S IT'S VERY CAR TRAFFIC HEAVY.
UM, IS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION TO ADD STOP SIGNS OR ANY WAY TO SLOW DOWN CARS? YOU KNOW, WHERE THAT WALGREENS AND THE LOWE'S AND THE PARKING LOTS, ALL KIND OF INTERSECT AND COME OUT THERE IS ALREADY, UM, A STOPLIGHT AT THE, AT THE MAIN INTERSECTION, UM, UM, WHERE THE, THE NEW WAFFLE HOUSE WILL
[00:05:01]
BE LIKE COMING ON TO THAT.IS THAT A PUBLIC ROAD OR IS THAT THE ONE THAT'S KILLER TO THE, TO THE MAIN ACCESS ROAD AT THE MOMENT? OKAY.
SO THAT ROAD, UM, NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF AMBER, DO YOU KNOW IF THERE IS, IF IT'S A PRIVATE ROAD, THEN I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN, YOU KNOW, WE CAN TALK TO THEM.
UM, LET, LET ME INVESTIGATE THAT AND GET BACK TO YOU ABOUT, IT'S MORE OF A GENERAL QUESTION, NOT ABOUT SAFETY OVER THERE.
I, I CAN TALK TO OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND THEN ALSO I CAN SEE IF WE CAN TALK TO LOWE'S OR WHATEVER IT IS A GOOD QUESTION, BECAUSE ALSO THAT STOPLIGHT THERE, I MEAN, YOU CAN HAVE A LINE OF CARS AND ABOUT TWO CAN GET THROUGH IN ONE GREEN LIGHT, AND THEN IT, UH, THIS IS GOING TO ADD TO TRAFFIC IN THAT GENERAL VICINITY, BUT, BUT, BUT, YOU KNOW, BUT THAT CAN BE ADDRESSED AS NEEDED.
YEAH, WE CAN, WE CAN LOOK AT THAT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OKAY.
WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR ITEM FIVE? A UM, I'LL GO AHEAD AND MAKE THEM, OH, I'M SORRY.
I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM FIVE A AS WRITTEN.
IT HAS BEEN, UM, MOTION BY MYSELF, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR MCCALL.
IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT MOTION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
[A.
Consider and possible action on a recommendation to the City Council regarding a request by Rey Cedillos to rezone approximately 5.4 acres of land from ‘A’ to ‘R-1-T’ (Residential Townhouse 1) & approximately 4.6 acres ‘RS’ (Retail Services) for property located at 951 Windy Hill Road in Hays County, Texas. (Everardo Rosales - Z-22-0098)
- Public Hearing
- Recommendation to City Council
THERE IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM.
THERE'S ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
YOU MAY COME UP NOW, PLEASE KEEP YOUR TIME TO THREE MINUTES AND PLEASE FILL OUT ANY CITIZEN COMMENTS, FORM, UH, METALS OR KYLE NEIGHBORHOOD.
I ASSUME I NEED TO FILL OUT ONE OF THOSE FORMS AND GIVE YOU ALL THAT INFORMATION.
AND ALSO PLEASE, EXCUSE ME, I'M NEW TO THIS.
IT'S JUST, OF COURSE, WHEN SOMETHING HAPPENS AROUND YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, YOU KIND OF WANT TO GET A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION AND I UNDERSTAND THEY WANT TO BUILD TOWNHOMES AND RETAIL.
UM, SO I'M HERE TO MAINLY ASK QUESTIONS.
AS IN, DO YOU GUYS LOOK AT THE POTENTIAL PROPERTY VALUE EFFECT OF NEIGHBORING NEIGHBORHOODS AS LONG ALONG WITH THE POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL REVENUE FROM THE TOWNHOMES THAT WILL PRODUCE PROPERTY OR INCREASED PROPERTY VALUES? SO, UM, I HAD MORE PEOPLE CAN SHOW UP, BUT THEY DIDN'T.
SO, UH, THAT'S MY MAIN QUESTION IS, DO YOU GUYS TAKE AN ACCOUNT OF THE EFFECTS OF PROPERTY VALUES SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED TOWNHOME AND RETAIL CENTER? THAT'S ALL I GOT.
UM, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK AT, UH, FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING? OKAY.
SEEING NOW I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED, UH, MR. KAYLA SHARP CITY FOR THE RECORD, ME SHARE THIS REALLY QUICK.
SO THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS LOCATED AT, UM, 9 5 1 WINDY HILL ROAD.
IT IS IN OUR CITY LIMITS AND IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED AGRICULTURE.
UM, AND IT WAS GIVEN THAT ZONING DESIGNATION UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY.
UM, AND THEY ARE REQUESTING TO REZONE, UM, APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES, HALF OF ABOUT HALF OF WHICH WILL BE RETAIL SERVICES, UM, RIGHT ALONG WINDY HILL ROAD.
AND THE BACK PORTION WILL BE, UM, R ONE T, WHICH IS, UM, TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL.
AND SO THE RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOME ZONING ALLOWS FOR 10
[00:10:01]
UNITS PER ACRE.UM, SO STILL FAIRLY LOW TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.
UM, AND THEN THE RETAIL SERVICES WILL PERMIT THINGS LIKE, YOU KNOW, RESTAURANTS, RETAIL STORES, THINGS LIKE THAT.
UM, AND IT IS COMPLIANT WITH OUR CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
UM, THE RETAIL SERVICES AND OUR WARRANTY ARE BOTH RECOMMENDED IN THIS AREA AND IT IS, UM, IT'S A NATURAL INCREASE IN DENSITY TO THE SURROUNDING AREA WITH THE, UM, SINGLE FAMILY BEHIND IT AND THE SURROUNDING ZONING DISTRICTS, UM, HAVING A MORE DIVERSE, UM, ZONING IS BENEFICIAL IN THIS AREA AND THE RETAIL SERVICES, UM, THAT WOULD BE PROVIDED WILL, UM, HELP TO KIND OF INCREASE TRAFFIC AND MAYBE NOT HELP INCREASED TRAFFIC, BUT, UM, THERE WILL BE MORE VARIETY WITHIN THE AREA.
SO, AND HE, UM, THERE'S ALSO TALK ABOUT POSSIBLY EXTENDING THE VIBE TRAIL INTO, UM, GOING ALONG THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY AND YEAH, AS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUPPORTS THIS REZONING, UM, STAFF ASKS THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUPPORT THE ZONING REQUEST AS PRESENTED.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? UM, OKAY.
ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION WITH A MOTION? YES, SIR.
I BELIEVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEMS SIX.
UM, I WILL SECOND IT, UM, IT'S BEEN MOTION BY COMMISSIONER JAMES SECONDED BY MYSELF.
IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT MOTION? OKAY.
UM, SO I, I DO LIKE THE FACT THAT IT IS CLOSE TO AT LEAST THE CURRENT PLANNED VIBE TRAIL.
UM, AND IF THAT'S EVEN EXTENDED EVEN CLOSER TO THAT, THAT'D BE GREAT FOR BOTH THIS PROPERTY AND FOR, IS IT MEADOWS? UM, THE, THE, THE PROPERTY RIGHT NEXT TO IT? I THINK THAT WOULD BE A MUTUAL, BENEFICIAL SITUATION FOR BOTH OF THEM.
UM, I ALSO THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, THE, THE RETAIL SERVICES, I, IN A SITUATION LIKE THIS, THE, THE QUESTION I BELIEVE COUNSEL MAY HAVE IS ABOUT TRAFFIC AND THE ROADS AND PUTTING THIS ON THERE.
I THINK I, SMALL RETAIL SERVICE SECTION, LIKE THIS PROBABLY WON'T NECESSARILY INCREASE THE TRAFFIC.
IT'LL HOPEFULLY WHATEVER'S PUT, THERE WILL BE THINGS THAT THOSE PEOPLE ALREADY ON THAT ROAD WOULD ALREADY BE USING.
UM, AND THEN THE TOWNHOMES WE'LL GIVE OUR, WE'LL GIVE OUR TOWN MORE OF A DIVERSE HOUSING OPTIONS WITH NOT ADDING TOO MANY UNITS TO THAT ONE SPECIFIC LOCATION TO ADD TOO MANY MORE CARS ON THAT ROAD.
AND SO, UM, I THINK IT'S A, I AM IN SUPPORT OF THE USE OF THIS, FOR THAT PROPERTY.
AND WHAT ELSE HAVE ANY COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT.
UM, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
[B.
Consider and possible action on a recommendation to the City Council regarding a request by Stephen R. Jamison, P.E. to rezone approximately 32.34 acres of land from ‘A’ (Agriculture) to ‘RS’ (Retail Services) for property located at the north corner of E. RR 150 & SH-21 in Hays County, Texas. (FM RD 812, LLC - Z-22-0100)
- Public Hearing
- Recommendation to City Council
THERE IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM.
DOES ANYONE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? YOU MAY COME UP NOW, PLEASE AGAIN, LIMIT YOUR TIME TO THREE MINUTES AND FILL OUT A CITIZEN COMMENTS FORM.
SEEING NOW I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED NEXT.
UH, MR. KAYLA SHARP CITY PLANNER FOR THE RECORD.
ALRIGHT, SHARE THIS SO THIS PROPERTY IS PART OF AN APPROXIMATELY 102 ACRE, UM, PROPERTY AND THEY REQUEST IS TO REZONE ABOUT 32.34 ACRES OF THIS PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURE TO RETAIL SERVICES.
[00:15:01]
UM, SO IT COULD BE, YOU KNOW, RESTAURANTS, RETAIL STORES, THINGS LIKE THAT.UM, THERE'S NOT A WHOLE LOT IN THIS AREA AT THE MOMENT.
AND, UM, THE LOCATION PROVIDES THE OPPORTUNITY, UM, TO SPARK RETAIL DEVELOPMENT.
THAT'S CURRENTLY LACKING IN THIS PORTION OF THE CITY.
UM, IT IS ALSO, UM, RECOMMENDED FOR RETAIL SERVICES IN OUR CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
SO THERE'S, UM, NO ISSUES WITH THAT.
AND, UM, YES, STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND REQUESTS THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, UM, RECOMMENDED FOR THE REZONING.
UM, I NOTICED THAT THE REGIONAL NOTE IS ONLY IN HALF OF THE, UH, THE PARCEL WHEN WE ARE LOOKING AT THINGS COMING TO US WHEN IT, REGARDING HOW WE USE REGIONAL NODES, UM, HOW WILL THAT AFFECT HOW WE RECEIVED THOSE KINDS OF REQUESTS? BECAUSE IF PART OF THAT BUILDING IS INSIDE THE REGIONAL NODE AND PART OF THAT BUILDING IS OUTSIDE OF IT, DOES THAT LIMIT US IN ANY SORT OF WAY? UM, I BELIEVE THE ANSWER IS NO, BUT PLEASE.
IT SHOULDN'T LIMIT, YOU KNOW, IT'S KIND OF A BUBBLE, SO, YOU KNOW, YOU GET AS CLOSE AS YOU CAN.
AND IT WILL BE IF, IF THIS DOES PASSED, IT WOULD BE RETAIL SERVICES AND THEN AS LONG AS IT FITS WITHIN THE RETAIL SERVICES, UM, UH, THEN IT SHOULD BE ALLOWABLE OR NOT WHETHER THE PORTIONS IN THE REGIONAL NOTE OR RIGHT OUTSIDE OF IT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I'M SORRY.
W W WHAT ELSE WAS IT BESIDES THE REGIONAL NODE? IT WAS THE NEW SETTLEMENT, I BELIEVE SO.
YES, THE NEW SETTLEMENT COMMUNITY AND THE REGIONAL NODE.
AND THAT'S ALSO RECOMMENDED FOR RS.
SO IT'S RECOMMENDED, UM, CONDITIONALLY AND THE NEW SETTLEMENT, UM, AND IT IS RECOMMENDED IN THE REGIONAL NODE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STEPH? ALRIGHT.
WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD WITH A MOTION.
I MOVED THAT WE APPROVE ITEM SIX B.
IT HAS BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER CHASE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MARTHA.
UM, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? SO I AM STRONGLY IN FAVOR OF THIS.
I, I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT ALL OF OUR, ALL, ALL OF THE CITY THAT'S RIGHT ON 21 SHOULD BE REGIONAL NODE.
UM, I, I, THE CITY DOES NOT HAVE MUCH OF IT.
THAT'S IN THE SIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS AND WHAT IT IS I WOULD HATE TO SEE THAT BECOME A SUBDIVISION OR THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
I THINK, I THINK THIS IS THE CORRECT FIT FOR THAT LOCATION.
UM, IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? OKAY.
[7. General Discussion]
ITEM SEVEN, SEVEN, A GENERAL DISCUSSION DISCUSSION ONLY REGARDING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. THIS IS YOUR TIME COMMISSIONERS.DOES ANYONE HAVE AN ITEM THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE ON A FUTURE AGENDA? OKAY.
[8. Staff Report]
I DON'T REMEMBER EIGHT STAFF REPORT, EIGHT A STAFF REPORT BY KAYLA SHARPS CITY PLANNER.SO WE DON'T HAVE TOO MUCH, UM, JUST A REMINDER THAT WE WILL NOT HAVE A WORKSHOP THIS MONTH, BUT WE WILL HAVE ONE IN JULY.
UM, AND THEN WE ARE WORKING ON THE CONTRACT WITH VIRGINITY, FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, UM, GATHERING SOME FINAL INFORMATION TO SEND THEIR WAY.
UM, SO YEAH, AND THEN THE, UM, AMENDMENT, UH, REQUESTED AMENDMENTS FOR, UH, MANUFACTURED HOMES AND MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS OR SUBDIVISIONS AND MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS, UM, WILL BE ON THE JULY AGENDA AND THEN A CONSIDERATION FOR A CODE REWRITE FOR FOOD TRUCKS AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, UM, IS COMING UP.
AND THEN JUST A REMINDER THAT THE CITY IS TAKING APPLICATIONS FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
AND, UM, ANOTHER REMINDER FROM THAT IS, UM, EVEN NUMBER SEATS ARE UP FOR REAPPOINTMENT.
[00:20:01]
THAT'S IT.DO WE PLAN TO HEAR ABOUT THE DOWNTOWN PLAN SOON? YES, I WAS JUST THE, THEY JUST WRAPPED UP THEIR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT, PUBLIC INPUT, UH, PIECE OF THE PLAN.
AND LAST I KNEW EVERYBODY WAS RESPONDING.
I THINK WE HAD OVER A THOUSAND RESPONSES, WHICH IS PRETTY SIGNIFICANT, SO WE'RE EXCITED.
SO THEY SHOULD BE COMPILING ALL OF THAT RIGHT NOW.
AND THEN IT WOULD BE NICE FOR THEM TO COME TO P AND Z AND GIVE YOU ALL A REPORT OF WHAT THEY'VE FOUND AND THEN HEAR INPUT FROM Y'ALL AS WELL.
I DON'T REMEMBER NINE A GENTLEMAN.
I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN SECOND.