Jul 09, 2025 Special Planning and Zoning Meeting

[I) Call Meeting to Order and Roll Call]

[00:00:07]

GOOD EVENING. TODAY IS WEDNESDAY, JULY 9TH, AND I WOULD LIKE TO CALL TO ORDER THIS SPECIAL MEETING FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. MAY I HAVE A ROLL CALL, PLEASE? COPELAND. HERE. WEBB. HERE. STEGALL. HERE. ONCKEN. HERE. HERE. HOUK. SERRATA. HERE. OKAY.

[II) Approval of Minutes]

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE SAY I. I. ALL OPPOSED? SAY NAY. THERE WE GO. WE HAVE MINUTES APPROVED. CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD. WITH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WELCOMES COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS. THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE ENCOURAGED TO SIGN IN BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS. SPEAKERS MAY BE PROVIDED WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK DURING THIS TIME PERIOD ON ANY AGENDA ITEM OR ANY OTHER MATTER CONCERNING CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BUSINESS, AND THEY MUST OBSERVE THE THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT. AT THIS TIME, I WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN CITIZEN COMMENTS. EVERYONE'S HERE FOR WORK. OKAY. WE WILL CLOSE

[IV) Consent Agenda]

OKAY. IS THERE A SECOND? I WILL SECOND. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA FROM COMMISSIONER SERRANO AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CALIPHATE. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT? OKAY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE SAY I. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? SAY NAY. OKAY.

[3) Consider approval of a conditional use permit for a multi-tenant shell building located at 19037 IH-35. (Amberwood Ranch - CUP-25-0129)]

MISS SHARP. ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, KAYLA SHARP, SENIOR PLANNER. SO TONIGHT WE HAVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MULTI-TENANT SHELL BUILDING IN THE I-35 OVERLAY. SO THIS IS IN THE AMBERWOOD RANCH SUBDIVISION THAT YOU'RE PROBABLY ALL FAMILIAR WITH. THIS WILL BE THE LAST PAD SITE TO CLOSE OUT THIS PROJECT. SO THEY'RE LOOKING TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 11,840 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING. AND THE MATERIALS CONSIST ALMOST ENTIRELY OF BRICK, AND THERE ARE APPROPRIATE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES TO ACCENT THE BUILDING. SO THE TOP IS THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, AND THEN THE BOTTOM IS, IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE BUILDING, THE RIGHT SIDE.

SO IT'S PRETTY MUCH ENTIRELY BRICK WITH GLAZING AND AWNINGS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. THERE'S ALSO IT'S A LITTLE BIT HARD TO TELL IN A 2D IMAGE, BUT THE WHITE IS KIND OF BUMPED OUT A LITTLE BIT IN FRONT OF THE GRAY. SO THERE'S SOME CHANGE IN ELEVATION A LITTLE BIT THERE.

AND THEN ON THIS ONE THE TOP IS THE BACK OF THE BUILDING, AND THEN THE BOTTOM IS THE LEFT SIDE OF THE BUILDING. IF YOU'RE IF YOU'RE FACING THE FRONT. SO THERE WILL BE ONE DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW HERE AS WELL. SO HERE IS THE OVERALL SITE PLAN. IT'S THAT BOTTOM RIGHT BUILDING. AND THEN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THEY'VE GOT SOME ADDITIONAL SCREENING BEHIND FOR ALL OF THE UTILITIES. AND THEN THEY MEET THE ONE TREE WITHIN 50FT OF EVERY PARKING SPACE. HERE IS THEIR PHOTOMETRIC SHEET. AND YOUR OPTIONS TONIGHT ARE TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED. APPROVE WITH MODIFICATIONS OR DENY. STAFF HAS FOUND THE PROPOSED PLANS COMPLIANT WITH CHAPTER 53 AND THE I-35 OVERLAY.

AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? JUST A QUICK COMMENT. I WOULD NOTE THE PARKING LOT INSIDE OF THAT AREA HAS SEEN SOME WEAR AND TEAR. I THINK UNRELATED TO THIS PROPERTY, BUT MAYBE A GOOD TIME TO HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH THAT

[00:05:04]

AND I BELIEVE SOME OF THOSE OTHER PARKING AREAS THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT ARE THEY'RE WORKING THROUGH MAKING REPAIRS. PERFECT. SO ANOTHER QUESTION CONCERNING PARKING WITH THE PARKING THERE BE PART OF A SHARED LOT OF THE ENTIRE COMPLEX. IS IT NOW IS STRUCTURED. AND I AGREE THAT THAT'S A CONCERN IS HOW THE LOTS WERE BUILT OUT. THE SURFACE WAS NOT DONE WELL IN SEVERAL PLACES. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DID THEY MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR PARKING SPACES FOR THAT COMPLEX? YES THEY DID. SO THEY'VE ACTUALLY EXCEEDED. OKAY. WHAT WAS IN PLACE PER OUR CODE AT THE TIME? I KNOW THAT AREA IS PRETTY CRAMPED RIGHT NOW. YES, YES. SO IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO SEE ON THIS TABLE, BUT THEY DO MEET OR EXCEED THEIR MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THEIR FOR THEIR BUILDING. OKAY. ANOTHER QUESTION WOULD BE ABOUT THE BACK OF THE BUILDING, WHICH I BELIEVE IS THE WHICH ELEVATION IS THAT I DON'T HAVE. STOP. IT'S THE SOUTH THAT FACES THE INTERIOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT OR THE BACK OF THE DEVELOPMENT. IT'S THE INTERIOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT IS THE BACK OF THE BUILDING FACES THE REAR PROPERTY LINE. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OKAY. WE WOULD NEED A MOTION AND A SECOND TO TAKE ACTION ON THIS ITEM. MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER COPELAND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER WEBB. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? OKAY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE SAY AYE. ALL OPPOSED? SAY NAY. OKAY. THAT

[4) Consider approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a proposed brewery located at 705 N Old Highway 81. (CUP-24-0116)]

SO THE I-35 OVERLAY, AS YOU ALL ARE AWARE, HAS VERY SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING MATERIALS. THE OLD HIGHWAY 81 OVERLAY DOES NOT, SO THEY ARE REQUESTING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BUILDING MATERIALS PORTION. THE SITE OTHERWISE MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OVERLAY. THE I-35 OVERLAY THAT IS. SO THE APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION IS THAT THE SITE DOES NOT FRONT OR HAVE DIRECT ACCESS FROM I-35. THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS SET BACK TOWARDS THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. THERE'S ALSO A PRETTY SIGNIFICANT STREAM BUFFER THAT RESTRICTS THE BUILDABLE AREA ON THE SITE, AND THERE ARE A TON OF LARGE, MATURE TREES THAT ARE BEING PRESERVED THAT FURTHER REDUCE VISIBILITY FROM PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. AND THEN, AS I MENTIONED, THE INTENT AND SITE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OVERLAY DISTRICTS HAVE BEEN MET. SO STAFF ANALYSIS, GIVEN SOME OF THE SITE CONSTRAINTS IN THE NATURAL VEGETATIVE SCREENING AND MEETING THE SITE REQUIREMENTS, STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE REQUEST. GENERALLY, WE DO HAVE A COUPLE MODIFICATIONS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE RECOMMENDING, AND I'LL GET INTO THOSE IN A SECOND.

SO YEAH, THAT BEING SAID, WE'RE GOING TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS THAT WILL BE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. SO HERE IS GOING TO GET A LITTLE BIT OUT OF ORDER. AND HOW I USUALLY PRESENT THESE JUST TO KIND OF GIVE YOU ALL A BETTER UNDERSTANDING. SO HERE'S THE SITE PLAN I KNOW IT'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFICULT TO READ IN SOME PLACES, BUT JUST KIND OF POINTING OUT WHERE THAT STREAM BUFFER STARTS AND THEN ALSO WHERE THE FRONT ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING WILL BE. THAT PLAN RIGHT SIDE IS NORTH OLD HIGHWAY 81, AND THEN PLAN LEFT IS REALLY WHERE THE RAILROAD TRACKS ARE. SO HERE IS THE FRONT FACADE, THE MAIN ENTRANCE INTO THE BREWERY.

SO THIS ONE HAS THE MOST IN TERMS OF MASONRY. THERE'S SOME BRICK, DECENT AMOUNT OF BRICK AND STUCCO ON THIS FRONT FACADE. AND THEN THEY HAVE A CANOPY GLAZING, THINGS LIKE THAT. AND

[00:10:07]

SO LIKE I SAID, HERE'S THAT KIND OF BUILDING FLOOR PLAN WINDOWS WOULD KIND OF GENERALLY BE ABOVE THOSE RESTROOMS. SO THAT IS WHAT WE ARE RECOMMENDING FOR THAT SIDE. THIS IS THE SIDE THAT IS TECHNICALLY FACING THE RAILROAD TRACKS. SO YOU'VE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF THAT BRICK KIND OF PEEKING OUT FROM THE FRONT FACADE. AND THEN THIS ONE IS PRIMARILY STUCCO ON THIS SIDE.

AND THEN THE REAR OF THE BUILDING IS METAL PANELS. SO HERE'S KIND OF A RENDERING. YOU CAN KIND OF GET AN IDEA. THEY HAVE SOME. WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN, THEY HAVE SOME LIKE FOOD TRUCKS AND PARKING AREAS. SO THIS IS KIND OF THE GENERAL VIEW FROM LIKE THE FOOD TRUCK PADS AND PARKING AS YOU'RE WALKING TOWARDS THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING. SO JUST TO KIND OF GIVE YOU A BETTER IDEA, THIS IS KIND OF 3D GOOGLE EARTH IMAGE SHOWING WHERE THE ENTRANCE IS.

AND THEN I MEANT TO PUT KIND OF A SQUARE WHERE THE BUILDING IS GOING TO BE. SO IT'S A LITTLE BIT HARD TO SEE. I FORGOT TO DO THAT. BUT THE BUILDING IS REALLY GOING TO BE SET BACK TOWARDS THE REAR OF THE SITE, NESTLED IN ALL OF THOSE TREES THERE. AND THEN HERE IS KIND OF GOOGLE STREET VIEW SHOWING ALL OF THOSE TREES, REALLY, ALL OF THE ONES IN THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY ARE GOING TO BE PRESERVED, AS WELL AS A LOT OF THE TREES TO THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE THAT AREN'T WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND PARKING FOOTPRINT, THINGS LIKE THAT. SO HERE IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT'S A LITTLE BIT KIND OF DIFFICULT TO READ IN IN SOME AREAS, BUT LIKE I SAID, THEY'VE GOT A LOT OF NATURAL, LARGE, MATURE TREES THAT THEY'RE SAVING, AS WELL AS SOME ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE DOING AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AS WELL. AND THEN PHOTOMETRIC SHEET. AND YEAH, SO YOUR OPTIONS TONIGHT ARE APPROVE AS PRESENTED APPROVE WITH MODIFICATIONS. THOSE CAN BE THE STAFF RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS OR OTHERS AS THE COMMISSION DEEMS FIT. OR YOU CAN DENY THE REQUEST. SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING OPTION TWO APPROVE THE REQUEST WITH THE STAFF. RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS TO THE EAST FACADE, INCLUDING THE AWNING, THE WINDOWS AND THE PAINT. ANY QUESTIONS? WE DO ALSO HAVE THE ARCHITECT HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF Y'ALL HAVE THEM. PERFECT. THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS? YEAH. I'LL START. QUESTION IS THERE'S A THERE'S A DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE THERE CURRENTLY FOR THE LITTLE I THINK IT'S A PLANT SHOP. IS THAT GOING TO BE THE ENTRANCE FOR THE BREWERY ALSO. IS THERE JUST ULTIMATELY I'M TRYING TO GET AT IS THERE ONLY ONE ENTRANCE? THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE SEPARATE ENTRANCES. YOU'RE SHAKING YOUR HEAD. YES, YES. THERE'S THAT EXISTING BUILDING. IT'S ALL IT'S ALL THE SAME OWNER. SO I THINK THE DRIVEWAY MIGHT EXPAND A LITTLE BIT OR MAYBE SHIFT A TINY BIT. BUT YES, IT'S THE ONE OKAY. AND THAT BUILDING IS GOING TO REMAIN THERE AND ITS CURRENT USE AS WELL. I DON'T BELIEVE IT. NOT IN ITS CURRENT USE, I DON'T IT'S NOT THE PLANT SHOP ANYMORE. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THAT STREAM BUFFER. LOOKING AT THE FLOOD MAPS, IT'S NOT INSIDE OF A FLOOD ZONE OR FLOODWAY, ANYTHING OF THAT KIND OF NATURE.

BUT IS THERE ANY OTHER CONCERNS ABOUT POTENTIAL FLOODING RISKS OR HOW THAT STREAM BUFFER ACTUALLY WOULD FUNCTION IN PROXIMITY TO THIS BUILDING? SO OUR OUR STREAM BUFFER IS GENERALLY KIND OF DETERMINES THE BUILDABLE AREA OF THE SITE. IN THIS CASE, THERE IS A VERY LARGE

[00:15:03]

YEAH. THANK YOU. ONE QUESTION I ASSUME THAT THIS IS A RETAIL ZONING. YES. IT IS NOT WAREHOUSE. OKAY. I ALSO NOTICED IT HAS AN OVERHEAD DOOR. I COULDN'T HELP BUT SAY THAT. IS THERE GOING TO BE SIGNAGE ON THE FRONTAGE ROAD THERE FOR THE BREWERY? POTENTIALLY. I DON'T THINK I'VE ASKED THE APPLICANT THAT SPECIFICALLY. I WOULD IMAGINE SO. THEY'LL HAVE CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS THEY HAVE TO MEET AS FAR AS DISTANCE FROM RIGHT OF WAY AND THINGS LIKE THAT WHEN THEY GET TO THAT STAGE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? WHEN'S THE TARGET OPEN DATE. DON'T KNOW.

YOU'LL JUST STATE YOUR NAME. SURE. STEPHEN OLIVER WITH OPEN DESIGN STUDIO AND, YOU KNOW, PENDING APPROVAL, WE GOT TO GET THROUGH THE BUILDING PERMIT PHASE AS WELL. AND THEN IT'S A YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION AFTER THAT. SO HOPEFULLY IT'S BEEN A LONG PROCESS TO DATE. SO HOPEFULLY THIS WILL COME TO A SUCCESSFUL END SOON. THANK YOU. ANY LAST QUESTIONS. JUST A COMMENT. THIS LOOKS REALLY COOL. THIS IS THE KIND OF CHARACTER THAT I PERSONALLY WOULD LOVE TO SEE IN HOUSE THIS. FANTASTIC. A LITTLE BIT OF A CONCERN THAT IT DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE I-35 OVERLAY.

NOT BECAUSE I LOVE THE LOOK OF THE I-35 OVERLAY DESIGN STANDARDS. I DO NOT, BUT I THINK IT'S EVERYONE THAT'S APPLIED FOR. AN EXCEPTION HAS A REASON, RIGHT? NOBODY SAYS JUST BECAUSE THEY ALL HAVE A REASON. SOME ARE BETTER THAN OTHERS. I THINK IT'S HARD FOR US TO LOOK AT THEM AND SAY, YES, WE'LL APPROVE YOUR EXCEPTION TO THE I-35 OVERLAY AND LOOK AT SOMEBODY ELSE AND SAY, NO, WE WON'T APPROVE YOURS BECAUSE WE THINK THIS LOOKS COO, OR WE LIKE THE CONCEPT.

PRINCIPLES ARE A PAIN, BUT I THINK SOMETIMES I, I HAVE A HARD TIME NOT FOLLOWING THE RULES ON THIS ONE. OKAY? IT LOOKS MUCH BETTER. PERSONALLY, I THINK IT LOOKS MUCH BETTER THE WAY IT IS NOW THAN IT WOULD IF IT COMPLIED WITH THE I-35 OVERLAY. I THINK OUR ROLE UP HERE IS TO COMPARE IT TO WHAT THE RULES ARE AND SAY, DOES IT MATCH OR DOES IT NOT? THAT'S MY CONCERN. OKAY.

AND WE'LL HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE EVERYONE ON THE DAIS PARTICIPATE IN DISCUSSION AROUND THAT. WHEN WE ARE DISCUSSING A MOTION ON THIS ONE, SO WE CAN HAVE A LIVELY DISCUSSION IF Y'ALL WANT. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I DID JUST HAVE ONE LITTLE ONE HERE AND THIS THIS SITE PLAN HERE. WHAT ARE THE OPERATIONAL SITE PADS TO THE PLAN LEFT? YEAH. PLAN LEFT. I BELIEVE THOSE ARE INTENDED TO BE FOR THE FOOD TRUCKS. OH, OKAY. OKAY. GOT IT. OKAY. ALRIGHTY. WE WOULD NEED A MOTION AND A SECOND TO TAKE ACTION. OVERALL, I THINK THIS IS A REALLY COOL CONCEPT TO BRING TO KYLE. SO I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE EXTENDED AWNING AND THE CURRENT MODIFICATIONS THAT STAFF HAS ADDED TO THE PLAN. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONER SERATO. IS THERE A SECOND ON THAT SECOND, WHO SAID THAT? YOU THERE. OKAY. COMMISSIONER COPELAND HAS SECONDED THAT.

DISCUSS. MY DISCUSSION ITEM MIGHT HAVE BEEN A FEW SECONDS EARLIER, BUT THAT IS STILL MY CONCERN. THAT'S FAIR. IT'S MY CONCERN TOO, IN TERMS OF CONFORMITY. YEAH, THERE'S A STANDARD THERE. AND WE BUMPED UP HARD AGAINST THAT SOMETIMES AND HAD TO TAKE A STAND. AND THAT WAS MY QUICK COMMENT. SOME OF YOU WOULDN'T HAVE RECOGNIZED ABOUT THE OVERHEAD DOOR, RIGHT.

YEAH. BUT OVERALL, GIVEN THE SITING HERE, I THINK THAT I'M COMFORTABLE WITH MAKING THE KINDS OF ACCOMMODATIONS THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED. MOSTLY BECAUSE IT'S A WAY FOR MY 35. IT'S GOT SO MUCH SCREENING AROUND IT, BUT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY ATTENTION TO THIS AS AN EXAMPLE,

[00:20:02]

SO THAT WE NOT BE IN A POSITION WHERE WE'RE COMPROMISING A STANDARD, BUT MAYBE WE'RE IN A POSITION TO RECOMMEND CHANGES OF THE STANDARDS IS THE POSITION I WOULD RATHER BE IN AT SOME POINT. BUT AS FAR AS THIS ONE GOES, I WOULD SUPPORT IT. I'M WITH YOU ON THE CHANGES OF THE STANDARDS, AND IF THOSE HAD CHANGED AND IT CAME BACK IN FRONT OF US, I THINK IT WOULD BE A DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT QUESTION IN MY MIND. I'M TRYING TO THINK, OKAY, WHAT IF THIS WASN'T A BREWERY THAT I WOULD LOVE TO GO TO ON THE WEEKENDS? IF THIS WAS A FLOORING STORE OR A WENDY'S, WOULD WE BE AS INCLINED TO MAKE AN EXCEPTION FOR IT? YOU KNOW? THAT'S TRUE, BUT I THINK IN THE PAST, SEVERAL THAT HAVE COME THROUGH WITH PROPOSED EXCEPTIONS, WE'VE GENERALLY MADE MODIFICATIONS TO IT TO GET IT CLOSER TO THE STANDARD, AT LEAST AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, MUCH AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE. I THINK FOR THE MOST PART TO GET IT THERE. AND I THINK THE STAFF HAS MADE SOME RECOMMENDATIONS TO HELP ENHANCE THE CHARACTER. AND GIVEN THE OTHER CONSIDERATIONS HERE WITH DISTANCE TO I-35, AND IT SEEMS LIKE IT COULD BE A REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE. I'D ALSO NOTE THAT IF YOU JUST DROVE UP THAT SAME ROAD, IT LOOKS TO CONFORM WITH OTHER BUILDINGS ON THAT ROAD. IT'S A GOOD BLEND OF WHAT ELSE IS ALREADY THERE. AND SO I THINK FOR THAT REASON, I'M SO SUPPORTIVE OF THIS EXCEPTION. ARE YOU READY FOR THE VOTE? PLEASE OUTVOTE ME. WELL, MY LAST COMMENTS BEFORE WE BRING THIS FOR A VOTE, I GUESS, WOULD BE THAT I WANT TO THANK STAFF FOR ADDING AWNINGS. I LOVE AWNINGS, ESPECIALLY FUNCTIONAL AWNINGS, AND I APPRECIATE THAT Y'ALL ADDED THAT BEFORE IT CAME TO US. SO THANKS FOR THAT. AND I'M ALSO LEANING TOWARDS THE SIDE OF WE LIKE WHEN PEOPLE ADHERE TO THE I-35 OVERLAY, BUT THIS IS A SITUATION WHERE IT IS SET BACK FROM THE ROAD. WHAT THEY'RE BRINGING IS A UNIQUE PRODUCT, SMALL BUSINESS. IT'S NOT LIKE A CHAIN OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO I'M MORE MORE OPEN MINDED TO THIS BECAUSE IN MY MIND, THE I-35 OVERLAY IS GIVING A SENSE OF PLACE FOR KYLE. IT'S DOING SOMETHING TO DISTINGUISH IT FROM THE REST OF, I DON'T KNOW, THE BUSINESSES THAT YOU SEE WHEN YOU'RE DRIVING AROUND TEXAS AND THE LOOK OF THIS BUILDING IS PRETTY UNIQUE AND COOL, AND IT DOESN'T LOOK THOUGHTLESS OR JUST KIND OF SLAP DOWN THERE. SO I'M I'M SUPPORTIVE IN THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION. OKAY.

LET'S VOTE. THE MOTION ON THE TABLE IS TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE SAY I. I ALL OPPOSED. SAY NAY. NAY.

OKAY. MOTION PASSES. AND WITH THAT, WE HAVE DISCUSSED EVERYTHING THAT WAS ON OUR AGENDA FOR THE DAY. SO WE ARE ADJOURNED AT

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.