[I) Call Meeting to Order and Roll Call]
[00:00:09]
IT IS 6:30 PM JULY 28TH, 2026.
CALL TO ORDER THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KYLE, TEXAS.
MAY WE HAVE A ROLL CALL? COPELAND.
[II) Approval of Minutes]
COULD WE HAVE A CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES? UH, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES IN THE JULY 14TH MEETING.MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WEBB.
WAS THAT COMMISSIONER COPELAND? ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.
IT PASSES NUMBER THREE, CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD.
WITH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WELCOMES COMMENTS FROM THE CITIZENS EARLY IN THE AGENDA OF REGULAR MEETINGS.
SPEAKERS ARE PROVIDED WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK DURING THIS TIME PERIOD ON ANY AGENDA ITEM OR ANY OTHER MATTER CONCERNING CITY BUSINESS, AND THEY MUST OBSERVE THE THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? SEEING NONE, SUSAN'S COMMENTS ARE CLOSED.
[2) Consider approval of a Special Exception pursuant to Section 53-33(n)(9) to allow off-site parking to satisfy the minimum parking requirements for a proposed McDonald's restaurant located at 1833 W. FM 150. (SD-25-0266)]
CONSIDER IMPOSSIBLE.CONSIDER APPROVAL OF SPECIAL EXCEPTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 5 3 3 3 9 N NINE TO ALLOW OFFSITE PARKING TO SATISFY THE MINIMUM REPAR PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSED MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT AT 1833 WEST FM.
ONE 50 SD DASH 25 DASH 0 2 66.
UM, TONIGHT WE HAVE A SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST, UM, TO ALLOW OFFSITE PARKING TO SATISFY THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSED MCDONALD'S ON WEST FM ONE 50.
UM, THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO CONSTRUCT A AROUND 3,500 SQUARE FOOT MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT, UM, WITH DRIVE THROUGH LOCATED AT 1833 WEST FM ONE 50.
DUE TO SITE CONSTRAINTS, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE SPECIAL, SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ALLOW 10 OFFSITE PARKING SPACES TO SATISFY THEIR MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 53 33 N.
THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THIS PROPOSED MCDONALD'S IS 36 SPACES BASED ON A RATIO OF ONE SPACE PER 100 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA.
UM, ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT, BASED ON THE SITE CONSTRAINTS SUCH AS SIZE OF THE PROPERTY AND IMPERVIOUS COVER LIMITATIONS, THEY'RE ONLY ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE 26 PARKING SPACES ON THE SITE, INCLUDING TWO A DA ACCESSIBLE SPACES.
UM, MCDONALD'S IS ON, IS PROPOSED ON LOT THREE OF THE ADA ONE 50 SUBDIVISION.
THEY'RE WORKING WITH THE OWNER OF LOT FOUR TO ACQUIRE, UM, USE AND ACCESS TO THE 10 PARKING SPACES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO LOT THREE.
AT THIS TIME, THERE ARE NOT CURRENTLY ANY PLANS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOT FOUR.
UM, OTHER THAN THE APPROVED DRIVEWAY AND DETENTION POND.
THE OWNER OF LOT FOUR IS AWARE IN SUPPORTIVE OF THIS REQUEST AND THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF LOT FOUR WOULD BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THEIR PROPOSED USE, INDEPENDENT OF THESE 10 PARKING SPACES.
SO WHATEVER THEY BUILD, UM, THAT BUILDING WOULD NEED TO BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THEIR PARKING SEPARATE FROM THESE SPACES THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED FOR MCDONALD'S USE.
UM, IF THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CANNOT ACCOMMODATE THEIR MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS, THEY COULD WORK WITH THE CITY TO ESTABLISH EITHER A SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT, UM, WITH ANY OF THE FOUR LOTS IN THE SUBDIVISION, OR SEEK A PARKING REDUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE.
THE RED IS, UM, THE DRIVEWAY THAT'S ON LOT FOUR.
AND THEN THE PURPLE IS THE 10 PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE SITE.
UM, IT'S A LITTLE BIT HARD TO SEE IN THIS EXHIBIT, BUT ON THE PROPERTY ITSELF, ON LOT THREE, THEY HAVE 26 SPACES, INCLUDING THE TWO HANDICAP, AND TWO OF THEM ARE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON THE PLAN RIGHT OF THE PAGE.
UM, AND THEN THEY HAVE THE, THE 10 THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING ON LOT FOUR.
UM, STAFF ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO SECTION 53 DASH 33 N NINE, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER ANY SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS OR VARIANCES TO THE CITY'S ESTABLISHED PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
UH, STAFF HAVE REVIEWED, REVIEWED THE REQUEST, AND HAVE FOUND THE PROPOSAL WILL MEET MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS, UM, IF APPROVED STAFF WILL WORK TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE AGREEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION NOTES ARE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.
YOUR OPTIONS TONIGHT ARE APPROVE AS PRESENTED, APPROVE WITH MODIFICATIONS OR DENY THE REQUEST.
[00:05:01]
HAVE ACTUALLY HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS.UH, ONE, THE, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDING FOR THE REQUIREMENT, DOES THAT INCLUDE THE KITCHEN? YES.
SO TOTAL, SO, SO THE KITCHEN, SO THE KITCHEN'S NOT USABLE TO THE PUBLIC, AND SO THEORETICALLY THAT'S NOT CREATING A PROBLEM THERE.
THE, THE 36 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED ARE BASED ON THE GROSS FLOOR, RIGHT? SO, SO IT INCLUDES THE KITCHEN, BATHROOM, STORAGE, ANYTHING INSIDE THE BUILDING.
AND THEN, UH, DOES THIS AREA HAVE A PLAY AREA? UM, NO.
I SEE SHAKING, SEE, NODDING YOUR HEAD.
SO
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? A FEW QUESTIONS, IF YOU DON'T MIND.
SO THE MINIMUM A DA SPOTS PER CODE, THOSE ARE NOT AFFECTED BY THIS? THE ONLY SPOTS BEING OFFSITE WOULD BE STAFF OR OTHERWISE, NOT THE A DA PARKING SPOTS.
THE A DA, UM, SPACES ARE UP AT THE FRONT, NEAR THE FRONT DOOR.
AND THEN IN THE PRESENTATION IT TALKED ABOUT HOW STAFFS BE WORKING WITH THE DEVELOPER AND MAKING SURE THAT THIS ACTUALLY DOES COME THROUGH.
IF THE NEGOTIATIONS FALL THROUGH WITH THE LOT FOUR INDIVIDUALS, WHAT PARAMETERS EXIST TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S SOME AGREEMENT THERE? DOES THAT COME BACK TO P AND Z? DOES IT, IS IT ADDRESSED SOME OTHER WAY TO MAKE SURE THAT SOMETHING GETS ACCOMPLISHED THERE? ARE YOU REFERRING TO LIKE, SAY THIS REQUEST DOESN'T GET APPROVED.
UH, IF WE APPROVE TONIGHT AND AFTER TONIGHT, THE MCDONALD'S TEAM CAN'T COME TO AGREEMENT WITH THAT LOT FOUR ON THE MOVEMENT OF THOSE 10 SPOTS FOR WHATEVER REASON, WE KNOW THAT LOT FOUR IS IN FAVOR, BUT IF SOMETHING HAPPENS, DOES THAT COME BACK TO PNZ FOR RENEGOTIATION OR RE-APPROVAL OR IS THERE A DIFFERENT MECHANISM TO MAKE SURE THAT SOMETHING HAPPENS? POTENTIALLY.
IT JUST KIND OF DEPENDS WHAT HAPPENS.
UM, WE DO HAVE A DRAFT OF THE AGREEMENT THAT I BELIEVE THE OWNER OF LOT FOUR IS AGREEABLE TO AT THIS TIME, BUT THOSE ARE KIND OF PRIVATE NEGOTIATIONS.
UM, IF SOMETHING LIKE THAT WERE TO HAPPEN, THEY COULD EITHER, UM, SEEK A REDUCTION OR REWORK SOME OF THEIR PARKING AREAS.
IT WOULD JUST MAYBE RESULT IN HAVING TO COME BACK OR THERE MIGHT BE SOME OPTIONS TO, UM, APPROVE THERE.
WE DO HAVE SOME ALLOWANCES IN OUR CODE THAT ALLOW ADMINISTRATIVE REDUCTIONS, BUT IT'S ONLY UP TO LIKE 10%.
UM, BUT TYPICALLY THERE, THERE WOULD BE A PATH FORWARD SOMEHOW.
AND JASON HAS SOMETHING TO ADD?
UH, YEAH, AND I THINK FOR, UH, YOUR CONCERN IS, I, I THINK THE BIGGER CONCERN WOULD BE, SAY THEY GO UNDER CONSTRUCTION ALREADY AND THEN THIS FALLS THROUGH, HOW DO WE CLAW BACK? UM, AT THAT POINT, UM, WE WOULD NOT RELEASE THE BUILDING PERMIT UNTIL WE HAD THIS DOCUMENTED.
SO HOPEFULLY THAT WOULD CATCH THE BIG ISSUE THAT WE WOULD HAVE ANYTHING ELSE WE CAN WORK THROUGH.
AND IS THERE, OR WHY SHOULD WE TAKE ACTION TONIGHT VERSUS WAITING FOR THE NEGOTIATIONS TO BE FINALIZED AND THEN APPROVE WHEN WE KNOW IT'S ALL SIGNED AND DOTTED? SO THE APPLICANT CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT I BELIEVE THE NEGOTIATIONS ARE, ARE PRETTY MUCH COMPLETE.
THEY JUST HAVEN'T SIGNED IT UNTIL THEY ARE, CAN RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE COMMISSION.
'CAUSE IF THEY CAN'T RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE COMMISSION, THEN THERE'S NO NEED FOR THE AGREEMENT.
THEY NEED P AND Z'S APPROVAL TO CODIFY THAT DEAL ESSENTIALLY.
AND THEN OUTSIDE OF THE SCOPE OF THIS A LITTLE BIT, I THINK WE'VE HEARD A FEW, UM, WAIVER REQUESTS OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS.
I KNOW WE ARE PLANNING ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATES EVENTUALLY SOMEDAY.
COULD WE ADD THIS TO THE DISCUSSION? YES.
I THINK PARKING, UM, REQUIREMENTS AS A WHOLE ARE KIND OF ON OUR LIST TO AT, AT THE VERY LEAST, ANALYZE AS PART OF THAT PROCESS.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? MR. CHAIR? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE AS PRESENTED.
SECOND, WE HAVE COMMISSIONER HOLDER MAKING A MOTION FOR APPROVAL, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COPELAND DISCUSSION.
I'VE JUST GOT ONE COMMENT AND THAT WOULD BE, UH, FOR, FOR MY KNOWLEDGE IN VOTING ON THIS, IS THIS A LEASE PAD THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT FOR MCDONALD'S OR IS THIS OWNED STRAIGHT WAY OWNED OUT? RIGHT.
UM, IT'S THE SAME LANDOWNER LOT WORK.
CURRENTLY IT IS THE, THE SAME LANDOWNER, BUT MCDONALD'S WILL BE PURCHASING THEIR, THEIR LOT.
SO YOU'RE NEGOTIATING THE DEAL WITH YOURSELVES,
UH, LEE MORRIS WITH MCDONALD'S
[00:10:01]
NEW ADDRESS, 1140 MCGREGOR GUNNER, TEXAS.UM, WE'RE GONNA PURCHASE THE PROPERTY ONCE WE GET PERMITS.
AND THIS PARKING THING WORKED OUT FROM THE, THE, THE, THE LOT OWNER LOT FOUR MM-HMM
AND OUTTA CURIOSITY, WHY NOT ACQUIRE THE PARKING SPACES WHEN YOU'RE PURCHASING THE LOT? THAT'S THE, HE, HE WANTS THAT LAND.
HE IS GOT HIS POND BACK THERE.
UM, THIS WAS, THIS WAS IN HIS OPINION, THE BEST WAY TO, TO HANDLE IT.
THE LOT WAS ALREADY SUBDIVIDED, UM, PRIOR TO MCDONALD'S, UM, SIGNING A GOT IT.
LEASE AGREEMENT OR PURCHASE AGREEMENT OR WHATEVER SO HE COULD HAVE RE SUBDIVIDED.
SO YOU'RE WITH THE MCDONALD'S TEAM? YES.
UH, I JUST HAVE A GENERAL QUESTION.
WHY DID YOU GUYS PICK THIS LOT TO DEVELOP A MCDONALD'S? SEEMS LIKE WE HAVE A LOT IN KYLE ALREADY.
SEVERAL MCDONALD'S IN KYLE ALREADY, I SHOULD SAY.
OH, I'M, I'M NOT ON THE REAL, I'M THE CONSTRUCTION SIDE, BUT THEY, THEY HAVE GAP TRADE AREAS AND THEY, THEY LOOK AT LOCATIONS THAT HAVE THE, THE HOUSING DEMOGRAPHICS AND EVERYTHING THAT WOULD SUPPORT A MCDONALD'S.
QUESTION FOR, I DO WANNA SAY ON THE, THE SITE PLAN, JUST REASON WHY PARKING AND STUFF WASN'T GOING ON.
SO THIS, THERE'S ACTUALLY TWO PROJECTS THAT ARE ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER.
THERE'S ANOTHER ONE JUST SOUTH.
UM, THIS ONE IS ACTUALLY GONNA TIE IN AND CONNECT.
SO IF YOU'LL SEE ON THAT SCHEMATIC, THERE'S, THERE'S A DRIVE AISLE.
UM, SO THIS KIND OF HAPPENED, THEIR PROJECT WAS IN THE WORKS PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN.
WE HAD ANOTHER ONE SEPARATE, THEN WE HAD OUR ROAD BOND, WHICH CAUSED SOME, UH, MOVEMENT CHANGES.
AND SO WE WERE WORRIED ABOUT NOT HAVING LEFT TURNS, UH, FOR THAT SUBDIVISION.
SO THIS WAS A WAY FOR US TO MOVE SOME PEOPLE THROUGH.
SO, UH, THIS CAME ABOUT KIND OF LATE 11TH HOUR TO KIND OF SOLVE AN ISSUE WITH THE ROAD BOND.
SO THEY WORKED TOGETHER TO DO THAT.
SO THAT'S WHY THEY COULDN'T KIND OF GET UP ON THEIR SITE.
SO WE, WE BASICALLY, YOU'LL SEE THE DRIVE AISLE.
IF, IF WE GET THAT BACK ON THERE.
YEAH, IF WE CAN GET THE PRESENTATION BACK UP ON THE SCREEN.
YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE HEARD ME IF I WASN'T SPEAKING INTO THE MIC.
YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THERE'S TWO CONNECTIONS.
ONE, I'M POINTING AS IF Y'ALL CAN SEE WHERE I'M POINTING AT, BUT AT THE, UM, AT THE TOP OF YOUR SCREEN, UM, UP CLOSER TO, UM, FM ONE 50 ON THE PLAN RIGHT SIDE, THERE'S A CONNECTION INTO, UM, THE GAS STATION AND CAR WASH THERE.
BUT THEN AT THE PLAN SOUTH, UM, WHERE THE, THE RED DRIVEWAY DEAD ENDS, THERE'S A PROPOSED CONNECTION TO A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT THERE AS WELL, WHICH IS WHAT JASON WAS REFERRING TO.
IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO SEE ON THE SCHEMATIC, BUT WHEN YOU SEE IT ALL KIND OF TIED TOGETHER, ALL OF THE PLANS, IT MAKES SENSE.
NOW AS I'M UNDERSTANDING THIS, UM, PART OF OUR DISCUSSION THAT THE MOTION WAS MADE WITHOUT ANY CONTINGENCY REGARDING THE SIGNED AGREEMENT, UH, COMING FIRST.
UM, FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, WHEN THE COMMENT WAS MADE BY STAFF, THIS WOULD BE ESSENTIALLY OVERSEEN BY STAFF TO MAKE SURE THAT APPROPRIATE AGREEMENTS HAD BEEN MADE PRIOR TO PERMITTING.
WE'VE, WE'VE SEEN THE DRAFT AGREEMENT, IT JUST HASN'T BEEN, UM, SIGNED YET.
SO STAFF DIDN'T HAVE ANY, ANY COMMENTS ON IT.
UM, THEY'RE JUST WAITING FOR, FOR PNC CONSIDERATION BEFORE.
AND TO RECAP, WHAT I HEARD EARLIER IS THAT THAT AGREEMENT CAN'T BE SIGNED, BUT THE PARTIES DON'T BELIEVE THEY CAN SIGN IT UNTIL P AND Z SIGNS OFF ON THE AGREEMENT.
IS THAT WHAT WAS STATED? I CAN'T REALLY SPEAK TO WHETHER OR NOT IT COULD BE SIGNED.
IT JUST GENERALLY DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT THAT THEN ISN'T USABLE IF, IF THE CITY WON'T ALLOW THIS.
OKAY, CADE, LET'S, LET'S HAVE A VOTE ON THE MOTION.
[3) Consider approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a proposed cafe building located at 201 & 203 S Old Highway 81 in the IH-35 Overlay District. (Nila's Cafe - CUP-25-0149)]
SECOND ITEM, UH, FOR CONSIDERATION.TONIGHT IS, UH, APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL
[00:15:01]
USE PERMIT FOR PROPOSED CAFE BUILDING LOCATED AT 2 0 3 AND 2 0 1 AND 2 0 3 SOUTH OLD HIGHWAY 81 IN THE IH 35 OVERLAY DISTRICT, NILA CAFE CUP 25 0 1 4 9.I'M ANGEL NINE, SENIOR PLANNER.
THIS ITEM WE HAVE IS SPRAY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOCATED AT 2 0 1 AND 2 0 3, UM, SOUTH OLD HIGHWAY, UH, 81 IN THE I 35 AND THE OLD HIGHWAY, UM, 81 OVERLAY DISTRICTS.
UM, THERE IS A LITTLE LOCATION MAP THAT YOU CAN SEE HIGHLIGHTED ON THERE.
UM, SO JUST GOING THROUGH THE SUMMARY.
UM, SO THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING APPROVAL OF THE COP TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A NEW CAFE AT THIS LOCATION.
UM, AS I MENTIONED, IT'S IN THE CBD, OR SORRY, IN THE I 35 AND OLD HIGHWAY 81 OVERLAY DISTRICTS IN ITS OWN CBD TWO.
AND WE'VE HAD A COUPLE OF OTHER, UM, PROJECTS THAT STAFF HAVE REVIEWED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS PROJECT.
UM, WE'VE HAD A, UM, RE UH, REPL THAT WAS APPROVED A FEW MONTHS AGO, AND A SITE PLAN IS CURRENTLY IN REVIEW.
UM, IT'S READY TO RELEASE, UH, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE COP.
THE BUILDING MATERIALS FOR THIS, UM, PROPOSED BUILDING INCLUDE, UM, STONE BRICK STUCCO, AND, UM, IT MEETS THE I I 35 OVERLAY DISTRICT MASONRY REQUIREMENTS.
UM, THE SITE IS JUST UNDER A QUARTER ACRE.
UM, THE PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVER IS LI UH, ABOUT 62 AND A HALF PER, UH, 62, UM, 0.5%.
WE DON'T HAVE ANY IMPERVIOUS COVER LIMITATIONS IN THIS ZONING.
UM, THE PARKING SPACES, UH, WORK, THEY'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE FIVE AND THEY HAVE NINE, UM, TOTAL PROVIDED, INCLUDING THE ONE HANDICAPPED SPACE HERE IS THE SITE PLAN.
KNOW IT'S A LITTLE BIT HARD TO SEE ON THERE, UM, BUT YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS AS WELL AS THE PARKING SPACES.
UM, ALONG HAYES OVER THERE, UM, AT THE TOP.
AND THEN ON THE BACK, UH, AT THE ALLEY, THEY HAVE A FEW SPACES THAT THEY'RE PLANNING FOR MOSTLY, UM, EMPLOYEE, UH, PARKING SPACES.
UM, THE LANDSCAPING, UM, THE PROJECT WILL EXCEED, UM, THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
THEY'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE A 10% OF THE TOTAL SITE AS THE LANDSCAPE AREA.
UM, THEY'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE ONE TREE.
UM, THEY'RE REQUIRED, UH, TO HAVE THREE SHRUBS AND THEY'RE PROVIDING A TOTAL OF 241 APPROXIMATELY, INCLUDING A MIX OF DIFFERENT SHRUBS, FLOWERS, UM, AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES.
THAT ONE'S A LITTLE BIT HARDER TO READ ON THERE, BUT YOU CAN SEE THE PLANTING, UM, DETAILS.
UH, NEXT UP WE HAVE THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS.
UM, THEY DO MEET THE MASONRY REQUIREMENTS.
UM, YOU CAN SEE ON HERE THEY HAVE THE, UH, UH, PICTURES OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING MATERIALS, UM, IN THE CHART SHOWING THE 100%, UM, MASONRY.
UM, THAT'S THE, I THINK THE REAR ELEVATION.
AND THEN WE GOT THE LEFT SIDE AND THE RIGHT SIDE.
AND THEN THIS IS THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER, UM, THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AT THE BACK OF A BUILDING.
UM, STAFF HAVE REVIEWED THE CUP APPLICATION AND FIND THAT IT COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE CITY CODES.
UM, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THE LANDSCAPING EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.
UM, THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS, UM, MASONRY MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS.
UM, AND THE SITE PLAN ALSO MEETS APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS, UM, AND IS ESSENTIALLY READY FOR, UM, RELEASE PENDING, UH, APPROVAL OF THE CUP.
UH, YOUR OPTIONS TONIGHT ARE TO APPROVE THE COP AS PRESENTED, APPROVE THE COP WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE COP AND THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OPTION ONE TO APPROVE THE COP AS PRESENTED.
DO Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME? CAN YOU REMIND ME HOW LARGE THE FOOTPRINT IS? OH, THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
I DON'T REMEMBER THAT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD.
UM, LEMME SEE IF I CAN FIND THAT ON THE SITE PLAN.
OH 1 12 0 1, WHAT WAS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MCDONALD'S PARKING? ONE SPOT PER ONE PER 100.
[00:20:01]
THIS IS A DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICT THAT HAS DIFFERENT PARKING SPANS.THERE'S ALSO PLENTY OF ADDITIONAL PARKING ACROSS THE STREET THAT WOULD BE AVAILABLE DURING THE DAY.
WE APPROVE THIS, UH, CONDITION USE PERMIT AS PRESENTED.
COMMISSIONER RITH MAKES A MOTION FOR APPROVAL.
SECOND BY MADE BY COMMISSIONER WEBB.
DO WE HAVE A, UH, DISCUSSION SEEING AS THERE'S NO DISCUSSION? CAN WE HAVE A VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.
ALL OPPOSED? MOTION MOVES UNANIMOUSLY.
SEEING IS THERE NO FURTHER BUSINESS ON THE AGENDA THIS EVENING?